6533b86cfe1ef96bd12c8b5d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Delayed Anaerobic Threshold in Heart Failure Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Piergiuseppe AgostoniFrancesco MaffessantiSusanna SciomerMinodora TeodoruCristina Mihaela ChircuPietro PalermoCecilia AgalbatoElisa StefaniniDamiano MagrìElisa Compagninosubject
MalePulmonary and Respiratory Medicinemedicine.medical_specialtyPediatricsTime FactorsAnaerobic ThresholdPhysical Exertion030204 cardiovascular system & hematology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineHeart RateInternal medicineAtrial FibrillationHeart ratemedicineHumansSinus rhythm030212 general & internal medicineAgedHeart Failurebusiness.industryRehabilitationCardiopulmonary exerciseAtrial fibrillationMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseOxygen uptakeHeart failureExercise TestCardiologyFemaleCARDIAC OUTPUT INCREASECardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessAnaerobic exercisedescription
PURPOSE To assess whether atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) affects oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold ((Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 AT) and heart rate (HR) kinetics. METHODS A total of 15 patients with HF and AF and 18 with HF and sinus rhythm (SR) performed a maximal incremental and 2 constant workload cycle ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise tests (below and above AT, at 25% and 75% of maximal workload, respectively). At constant workload tests, kinetics of (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 and HR were assessed by calculating time constant (τ). RESULTS HF patients with AF showed a similar peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 to those with SR (16.7 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min vs 16.6 ± 3.9 mL/kg/min). However, (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 AT (11.3 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min vs 9.3 ± 2.8 mL/kg/min; P < .05), peak HR (149 ± 18.8 bpm vs 116.4 ± 20.4 bpm; P < .001), HR AT (125.3 ± 19.1 bpm vs 90.3 ± 15.5 bpm; P < .001), and HR increase during exercise were greater in HF patients with AF. Finally, τHR and τ(Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 below and above AT were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS In HF patients with AF, despite a similar peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 compared with patients with HF and SR, (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 AT is higher because of a higher HR and a greater HR increase during exercise. One postulated mechanism would be a greater cardiac output increase at the beginning of exercise in HF patients with AF. The delayed AT generates uncertainty about the meaning of a (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 value at AT in HF patients with AF, because a higher AT is usually associated with better performance and a better prognosis.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-05-01 | Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention |