6533b86cfe1ef96bd12c8c7c
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Number of drugs used in secondary cardiovascular prevention and late survival in the population of Valencia Community, Spain.
Francisco J. Morales-olivasDomingo Orozco-beltranJuan SanchisCristina LopezVicente GilJorge A. R. NavarroJosep RedonJosep RedonJose Luis TrilloRuth Usosubject
DrugMalemedicine.medical_specialtyMedication Therapy Managementmedia_common.quotation_subjectmedicine.medical_treatmentPopulationMyocardial InfarctionAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsDisease030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyRevascularizationRisk Assessment03 medical and health sciencesAngiotensin Receptor Antagonists0302 clinical medicineInternal medicinemedicineSecondary PreventionHumans030212 general & internal medicineMyocardial infarctioneducationStrokemedia_commonAgededucation.field_of_studybusiness.industryConfoundingmedicine.diseaseSurvival AnalysisProfessional Practice GapsStrokeSpainFemaleHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessMacePlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsdescription
Abstract Background Drug treatment for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is recommended by guidelines, but it is not always followed in real life. This study wanted to assess the size of this gap and its impact on mortality in subjects after a cardiovascular event (MACE). Methods Patients with any of MACE in the period from January 1st 2011 to December 31st 2013, and more than one year of follow-up were selected from population of the Valencian Community. Drugs for secondary prevention were antiplatelets, renin-angiotensin system blockers and statins. Assessment of treatment was performed one year after the initial event. Mortality risk was assessed using Cox by the number of drug classes (G0 no medication, G1 one, G2 two and G3 three drugs) adjusted by confounders. Results A total of 92,436 patients (62% men, mean age 72 years) of whom 60.5% presented with stroke, 30.6% with myocardial infarction and 8.9% with revascularization were included. Among them, 4.1% were G0, 20.2% G1, 32.9% G2 and 42.7% G3. A progressive decrease in mortality was observed in G1 (HR 0.83, CI 95% 0.73–0.95), G2 (HR 0.70, CI 95% 0.60–0.82) and G3 (HR 0.61, CI95% 0.51–0.74) vs. G0. In diabetic subgroup, significant reduction of risk was observed in the G2 (0.79, CI 95% 0.63–0.98) and G3 (0.72, CI9 5% 0.56–0.95), but not in G1 (0.97, CI 95% 0.80–1.17). Conclusion A gap between guidelines and reality in the use of cardiovascular protecting drugs one year after the initial event still exists and it is largely related with all-cause late mortality.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-10-01 | International journal of cardiology |