6533b86dfe1ef96bd12c95b7

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Choice alters Drosophila oviposition site preference on menthol

Claude EveraertsJérôme CortotDehbia Abed-vieillardJean-françois Ferveur

subject

QH301-705.5Science[ SDV.AEN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and NutritionZoologymentholBiology[ SDV.BA ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biologyaversive behaviourFood preferenceegg-laying behaviour;aversive behaviour;menthol;caffeine;sucroseGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologyToxicologychemistry.chemical_compoundBiologie animaleFood choiceMelanogasterFood and NutritionBiology (General)DrosophilacaffeineAnimal biologyLarva[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biologyQfungisucrosebiology.organism_classificationPreferenceegg-laying behaviourchemistryAlimentation et NutritionDrosophila melanogasterGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesMenthol[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and NutritionResearch Article

description

Summary Food choice and preference relies on multiple sensory systems that are under the control of genes and sensory experience. Exposure to specific nutrients and nutrient-related molecules can change food preference in vertebrates and invertebrates. For example, larval exposure of several holometabolous insects to menthol can change their adult response to this molecule. However, studies involving Drosophila melanogaster exposure to menthol produced controversial results due maybe to methodological differences. Here, we compared the oviposition-site preference of wild-type D. melanogaster lines freely or forcibly exposed to menthol-rich food. After 12 generations, oviposition-site preference diverged between the two lines. Counterintuitively, menthol ‘forced’ lines showed a persistent aversion to menthol whereas ‘free choice’ lines exhibited a decreased aversion to menthol-rich food. This effect was specific to menthol since the ‘free choice’ lines showed unaltered responses to caffeine and sucrose. This suggests that the genetic factors underlying Drosophila oviposition site preference are more rapidly influenced when flies have a choice between alternative sources compared to flies permanently exposed to the same aversive substance.

10.1242/bio.20136973https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01213167/document