6533b86dfe1ef96bd12ca0a9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comorbidity assessment for mortality risk stratification in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Francesc FormigaMeritxell SolerErnesto ValeroFrancisco MarínVicente RuizClara BonanadManuel Martínez-sellésSergio García-blasJuan SanchisJulio NúñezEmad Abu-assiArancha RuescasGema MiñanaAlbert Ariza-soléHéctor Bueno

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyAcute coronary syndromeTime FactorsAnemiaEnfermedad cardiovascularAncianoCharlson indexDiseaseComorbidityKaplan-Meier Estimate030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyRisk Assessment03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRisk FactorsInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusCause of Deathmental disordersInternal MedicinemedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineHospital MortalityProspective StudiesAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedProportional Hazards ModelsAged 80 and overbusiness.industrymedicine.diseaseComorbiditySpainRisk stratificationCohortCardiopatía coronariaFemalebusinessAncianos

description

Background The Charlson's is the most used comorbidity index. It comprises 19 comorbidities, some of which are infrequent in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), while some others are manifestations of cardiac disease rather than comorbidities. Our goal was to simplify comorbidity assessment in elderly non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients. Methods The study group consisted of 1 training (n = 920, 76 ± 7 years) and 1 testing (n = 532; 84 ± 4 years) cohorts. The end-point was all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up. Comorbidities were assessed selecting those medical disorders other than cardiac disease that were independently associated with mortality by multivariable analysis. Results A total of 130 (14%) patients died in the training cohort. Six comorbidities were predictive: renal failure, anemia, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and chronic lung disease. The increase in the number of comorbidities yielded a gradient of risk on top of well-known clinical predictors: ≥3 comorbidities (27% mortality, HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.20–3.03, p = .006); 2 comorbidities (16% mortality, HR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.81–2.04, p = .30); and 0–1 comorbidities (7.6% mortality, reference category). The discrimination accuracy (C-statistic = 0.80) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p = .20) of the predictive model using the 6 comorbidities was comparable to the predictive model using the Charlson index (C-statistic = 0.80; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p = .70). Similar results were reproduced in the testing cohort (≥3 comorbidities: 24% mortality, HR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.25–4.49, p = .008; 2 comorbidities: 14% mortality, HR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.82–3.07, p = .20; 0–1 comorbidities: 7.5% reference category). Conclusion A simplified comorbidity assessment comprising 6 comorbidities provides useful risk stratification in elderly patients with ACS. Sin financiación 4.329 JCR (2019) Q1, 26/165 Medicine, General & Internal 1.017 SJR (2019) Q2, 35/139 Internal Medicine No data IDR 2019 UEM

10.1016/j.ejim.2019.01.018https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30711360