6533b86dfe1ef96bd12ca1d4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Varying Definitions of Abundance and Incomplete Assemblages Challenge the Generality of the Interspecific Abundance—Distribution Relationships

Jussi PäivinenAtte KomonenJanne S. Kotiaho

subject

GeneralitybutterfliesEcologyEcologybusiness.industryperhosetDistribution (economics)Sample (statistics)Interspecific competitionBiologyNegative relationshipAbundance (ecology)ButterflyAnimal Science and ZoologybusinessEmpirical evidenceEcology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation

description

Empirical evidence does not fully support the universal nature of the positive interspecific abundance—distribution relationship. We have earlier documented a negative relationship for butterfly species in Finland, but recently our view was again challenged using a small subset of Finnish butterflies as apparent evidence. Here we scrutinize the critique and identify some general conceptual challenges in analyses of interspecific abundance—distribution relationships. We identify the common problem that the abundance—distribution studies include only a small subset of species, and thus reveal only sample characteristics, not overall patterns in complete assemblages. Small subsets of species are also unlikely to have sufficient power to reveal nonlinear relationships. Second, varying definitions of abundance, especially the practice of using a single point estimate to describe average density, further spur the empirical evidence for the abundance—distribution relationship. To get theoretically relevant resul...

https://doi.org/10.5735/086.048.0304