6533b86efe1ef96bd12cb4cb
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Knowledge, aptitudes, and preferences in implant dentistry teaching/training among undergraduate dental students at the University of Barcelona
Cosme Gay-escodaEsther Berástegui-jimenoMª ÁNgeles Sánchez-garcéssubject
MaleHealth Knowledge Attitudes Practicemedia_common.quotation_subjectmedicine.medical_treatmenteducationMEDLINEStudents DentalAptitude030209 endocrinology & metabolismEstudiants universitarisTraining (civil)OdontologiaSyllabus03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePedagogyEnsenyament de la medicinamedicineUB (Universitat de Barcelona)HumansCollege studentsGeneral DentistryCurriculumEducation Dentalmedia_commonMedical educationRehabilitationImplants dentalsImplant dentistrybusiness.industryResearchDental implants030206 dentistry:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Medicine educationDental ImplantationOtorhinolaryngologySpainDentistryUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASSchools DentalSurgeryAptitudeFemaleCurriculumSelf ReportOral SurgerybusinessEdentulous patientdescription
Background Oral implant rehabilitation should be considered a treatment option for any edentulous patient and Implant Dentistry is currently a discipline taught in the undergraduate formation. The level of knowledge acquired and how the students perceive the quality of training in Implant Dentistry could assess to know if it is necessary to improve the syllabus. Material and Methods A questionnaire was developed with 11 questions: Basic knowledge (7); Perception of training received (2); Ways in which students would receive training (2). To be responded anonymously and voluntarily for undergraduates students in the Faculty of Dentistry (University of Barcelona, Spain). Results One hundred and seven students, 76 third year (Group A) and 31 fourth year (Group B) answered the questionnaire. In Group A, 98.68% of students and in Group B 93.54% believed they were poorly informed; 100% of both groups would prefer to receive more training as part of the degree or as postgraduate training through modular courses imparted by experts (A: 71,05%, B: 70,96%) Training through postgraduate programs or training given by private businesses were the least desirable options (A: 42%, B: 64.51%). Questions about basic knowledge acquired received varying responses, which might indicate a certain level of confusion in this area. Conclusions The undergraduate syllabus must be revised to include sufficient content and training to allow the student to indicate implant-based treatments based on evidence. Students would prefer training to be included in the undergraduate syllabus. Key words:Dental implants, dental students, dental education, dental syllabus, implant dentistry.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-06-01 |