6533b86efe1ef96bd12cbd1d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Spinal and supraspinal mechanisms affecting torque development at different joint angles

Alain MartinValerie MustacchiJean-damien StevenotMaria PapaiordanidouMichele Vanoncini

subject

musculoskeletal diseasesmedicine.medical_specialtyPhysiologyElectromyographyKnee Joint03 medical and health sciencesCellular and Molecular Neuroscience0302 clinical medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysiology (medical)MedicineTorqueJoint (geology)medicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industry030229 sport sciencesAnatomymusculoskeletal systemCompound muscle action potentialbody regionsmedicine.anatomical_structureNeurology (clinical)Anklemedicine.symptomH-reflexbusinesshuman activities030217 neurology & neurosurgeryMuscle contraction

description

INTRODUCTION We examined the neural mechanisms responsible for plantar flexion torque changes at different joint positions. METHODS Nine subjects performed maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) at 6 ankle-knee angle combinations [3 ankle angles (dorsiflexion, anatomic position, plantar flexion) and 2 knee angles (flexion, full extension)]. Neural mechanisms were determined by V-wave, H-reflex (at rest and during MVC), and electromyography during MVC (RMS), normalized to the muscle compound action potential (V/Msup, Hmax/Mmax, Hsup Msup and RMS/Msup) and voluntary activation (VA), while muscle function was assessed by doublet amplitude. RESULTS MVC and doublet amplitude were significantly lower at plantar flexion (P < 0.01), while VA was significantly lower at dorsiflexion and full knee extension (P < 0.05). V/Msup and RMS/Msup were significantly lower at knee extension (P < 0.01), while Hsup/Msup was not affected by joint angle. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that joint positions leading to muscle lengthening produce reduced neural drive, due mainly to supraspinal mechanisms.

https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24895