6533b86ffe1ef96bd12cd3b8

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Two-year outcomes from the MitrAl ValvE RepaIr Clinical (MAVERIC) trial: a novel percutaneous treatment of functional mitral regurgitation.

John GregsonRonak RajaniStephen G. WorthleyBernard PrendergastMark HorriganF De MarcoAlan WhelanSimon RedwoodT. RafterJubin JosephTiffany PattersonAndrejs ĒRglisKaren WilsonDavid Hildick-smith

subject

Heart FailureHeart Valve Prosthesis Implantationmedicine.medical_specialtyMitral valve repairMitral regurgitationPercutaneousbusiness.industrymedicine.medical_treatmentMitral Valve Insufficiencymedicine.diseaseNyha classmedicine.anatomical_structureTreatment OutcomeHeart failureInternal medicineMitral valvemedicineCardiologyHumansMitral ValveProspective StudiesCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineAdverse effectbusinessFunctional mitral regurgitation

description

AIMS We report the 2-year outcomes of the MitrAl ValvE RepaIr Clinical (MAVERIC) trial. Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with poor outcomes for which there remains an unmet clinical need. ARTO is a transcatheter annular reduction device for the treatment of FMR and an emerging alternative for patients at high surgical risk. The MAVERIC trial was designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the ARTO system in FMR and heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS MAVERIC is an international multicentre, prospective, single arm study enrolling patients with FMR grade ≥ 2, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥II symptoms despite maximal medical therapy. Patients were excluded if they had significant structural mitral valve abnormality or life expectancy <1 year. The primary outcome measures were a composite safety outcome and efficacy defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) reduction 30 days post-procedure. Secondary outcome measures included safety, change in MR grade, NYHA class and hospitalization for HF at 2 years. Forty-five patients were enrolled. The composite safety outcome was met (2/45 adverse events at 30 days) and no device-related deaths occurred at 2-year follow-up. A sustained reduction in MR [grade < 2: 21/31 (68%) vs. 31/31(0%); P < 0.0001], left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (90.0 ± 30 vs. 106 ± 26 mL/m2 ; P = 0.004) and anteroposterior diameter (35.5 ± 4.7 vs. 41.4 ± 4.6 mm; P < 0.0001) was seen at 2 years compared to baseline. Progressive symptomatic improvement [NYHA class ≤II: 27/34 (80%) vs. 12/34 (36%); P < 0.0001] and a reduction in HF hospitalizations (19.8% 2 years post vs. 52.3% 2 years prior; P < 0.001) were seen at 2 years compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS The ARTO system is a safe and effective treatment for FMR with reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic volumes sustained to 2 years.

10.1002/ejhf.2321https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34363280