6533b86ffe1ef96bd12cd4ac

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Identity Formation in Adulthood: A Longitudinal Study from Age 27 to 50.

Lea PulkkinenKatja KokkoPäivi Fadjukoff

subject

Longitudinal studySociology and Political Sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectsalience050109 social psychologyidentity developmentReligious identityArticleDevelopmental psychology5. Gender equalityidentity domainsfollow-upPersonality0501 psychology and cognitive sciences10. No inequalityta515media_commonAdult developmentcongruence05 social sciencesOriginal ArticlesMiddle ageCongruenceIdentity developmentoverall identityidentity statusCohortmiddle-agePsychology (miscellaneous)PsychologyIdentity formation050104 developmental & child psychology

description

Longitudinal patterns of identity formation were analyzed in a representative cohort group of Finnish men and women born in 1959 across ages 27, 36, 42, and 50. The data were drawn from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality. Identity status (diffused, moratorium, foreclosed, achieved) from all four ages was available for 172 participants (54% females). Marcia’s Identity Status Interview used in this research included five domains: religious beliefs, political identity, occupational career, intimate relationships, and lifestyle. The findings indicated great variability in identity status across domains at each age level, and the identity trajectories fluctuated from age 27 to 50. The developmental trend from age 27 to 50 was moderately progressive (toward achievement) for the five domains and for overall identity, with the exception of a slightly regressive trend in male religious identity. Remaining stable in the same status category across the four measurements was rare and emerged only for diffusion in the ideological domains. Women generally outnumbered men in identity achievement at earlier ages, but the gender differences diminished in most domains at age 50, except in religious identity. In women overall diffusion decreased over time, but in men it remained at about 20% at ages 42 and 50. peerReviewed

10.1080/15283488.2015.1121820https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27019650