6533b86ffe1ef96bd12cdad7

RESEARCH PRODUCT

a 0 (980)− f 0 (980) mixing in χ c1 → π 0 f 0 (980)→ π 0 π + π − and χ c1 → π 0 a 0 (980)→ π 0 π 0 η

V. R. DebastianiV. R. DebastianiMelahat BayarMelahat Bayar

subject

PhysicsNuclear and High Energy PhysicsMeson010308 nuclear & particles physicsScatteringPropagator01 natural sciencesPseudoscalarAmplitudeIsospinQuantum mechanics0103 physical sciencesSinglet stateAtomic physics010306 general physicsMixing (physics)

description

Abstract We study the isospin breaking in the reactions χ c 1 → π 0 π + π − and χ c 1 → π 0 π 0 η and its relation to the a 0 ( 980 ) − f 0 ( 980 ) mixing, which was measured by the BESIII Collaboration. We show that the same theoretical model previously developed to study the χ c 1 → η π + π − reaction (also measured by BESIII), and further explored in the predictions to the η c → η π + π − , can be successfully employed in the present study. We assume that the χ c 1 behaves as an S U ( 3 ) singlet to find the weight in which trios of pseudoscalars are created, followed by the final state interaction of pairs of mesons to describe how the a 0 ( 980 ) and f 0 ( 980 ) are dynamically generated, using the chiral unitary approach in coupled channels. The isospin violation is introduced through the use of different masses for the charged and neutral kaons, either in the propagators of pairs of mesons created in the χ c 1 decay, or in the propagators inside the T matrix, constructed through the unitarization of the scattering and transition amplitudes of pairs of pseudoscalar mesons. We find that violating isospin inside the T matrix makes the π 0 η → π + π − amplitude nonzero, which gives an important contribution and also enhances the effect of the K K ¯ term. We also find that the most important effect in the total amplitude is the isospin breaking inside the T matrix, due to the constructive sum of π 0 η → π + π − and K K ¯ → π + π − , which is essential to get a good agreement with the experimental measurement of the mixing.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.061