6533b86ffe1ef96bd12cdbb4
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Obsessional and Eating Disorder-related Intrusive Thoughts: Differences and Similarities Within and Between Individuals Vulnerable to OCD or to EDs
Amparo BellochConxa PerpiñáConxa PerpiñáMaría Roncerosubject
050103 clinical psychologymedicine.medical_specialty05 social sciencesCognitionDysfunctional familymedicine.diseasehumanities030227 psychiatry03 medical and health sciencesPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyEating disorders0302 clinical medicineRisk groupsEmotional distressmental disordersmedicine0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesPsychologyPsychiatryAssociation (psychology)description
Unwanted intrusive cognitions constitute the normal variant of clinically significant intrusive cognitions found in disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and eating disorders (EDs). This study investigates whether individuals who are vulnerable to OCD or EDs experience more intrusions than people with no vulnerability to these disorders, and it examines the consequences of obsessional (OITs) and eating disorder (EDITs) intrusions in the same individuals, taking into account their susceptibility to OCD, EDs or neither of the two. From a sample of 922 participants, three groups were formed: risk of OCD (n = 92), risk of EDs (n = 41) and a no-risk group (n = 100). EDITs were more frequent than OITs in the two risk groups. Within-group comparisons showed that in the OCD-risk group, the OIT had more negative consequences (interference, emotional distress, dysfunctional appraisals and neutralizing strategies) than the EDIT, whereas in the ED-risk group, the OIT and the EDIT instigated similar negative consequences. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-06-08 | European Eating Disorders Review |