6533b86ffe1ef96bd12ce94c
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Oral vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and implications for patient management.
Christian PuozzoVittorio GebbiaMary O'brienRudolf M. HuberRichard J. GrallaUlrich Gatzemeiersubject
medicine.medical_specialtyLung Neoplasmsmedicine.drug_classAdministration OralPharmacologyVinorelbineVinblastineRoute of administrationchemistry.chemical_compoundOral administrationCarcinoma Non-Small-Cell LungAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsMedicineAntiemeticHumansPharmacology (medical)Randomized Controlled Trials as Topicbusiness.industryCombination chemotherapyVinorelbineAntineoplastic Agents PhytogenicCombined Modality TherapyGemcitabineCarboplatinBioavailabilitySurgerychemistryOral vinorelbine small cell lung cancer.businessmedicine.drugdescription
Vinorelbine is an established treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both as a single agent and in combination chemotherapy. Recently, an oral form of this agent has been developed. Before accepting an established agent in a different administration form, rigorous testing is required to answer such questions as reliable bioavailability, continued safety and preservation of efficacy. In addition, an oral agent must provide patient convenience and acceptance, while being an economically sound approach. Oral vinorelbine was found to have acceptable and reliable pharmacokinetic profiles at clinically relevant dosage levels. Oral vinorelbine was found to have approximately 40% bioavailability; thus, a dose of 80 mg/m(2) orally is the equivalent of 30 mg/m(2) intravenously, and 60 mg/m(2) orally is the equivalent of 25 mg/m(2) intravenously. Studies also concluded a lack of food effect on the administration of oral vinorelbine. In addition, no drug-drug interactions were found with a variety of commonly used antineoplastic agents.Vinorelbine, either orally or intravenously, has been investigated in randomised phase II trials as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with NSCLC. In general, response and survival results with oral vinorelbine appeared similar to the intravenous agent. Adverse-effect profiles were also similar for the two formulations. Clearly, the issue of venous irritation does not exist with oral vinorelbine; however, nausea and vomiting were more frequent when vinorelbine was administered orally compared with intravenously when no planned antiemetic therapy is given.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007-06-30 | Drugs |