6533b86ffe1ef96bd12ce996

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Controlled feeding experiments with diets of different abrasiveness reveal slow development of mesowear signal in goats ( Capra aegagrus hircus )

Dennis W. H. MüllerThomas M. KaiserNicole L. AckermansEllen Schulz-kornasEllen Schulz-kornasJürgen HummelPatrick R KircherMarcus ClaussJean-michel HattDaniela E. WinklerDaniela E. Winkler

subject

0106 biological sciences010506 paleontology10253 Department of Small Animals1109 Insect ScienceEvolutionPhysiologyCapra aegagrusAquatic ScienceGeneral diet010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesMesowearAnimal scienceTime frameBehavior and Systematicsstomatognathic system1312 Molecular BiologyMolecular BiologyEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics0105 earth and related environmental sciences2. Zero hungerHerbivoreCrania630 Agriculture1104 Aquatic ScienceEcologybiology1314 Physiologybiology.organism_classificationTooth morphology1105 Ecology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsTooth wearInsect Science11404 Department of Clinical Diagnostics and Services570 Life sciences; biologyAnimal Science and Zoology1103 Animal Science and Zoology

description

ABSTRACT Dental mesowear is applied as a proxy to determine the general diet of mammalian herbivores based on tooth-cusp shape and occlusal relief. Low, blunt cusps are considered typical of grazers and high, sharp cusps typical of browsers. However, how internal or external abrasives impact mesowear, and the time frame the wear signature takes to develop, still need to be explored. Four different pelleted diets of increasing abrasiveness (lucerne, grass, grass and rice husks, and grass, rice husks and sand) were fed to four groups of a total of 28 adult goats in a controlled feeding experiment over a 6-month period. Tooth morphology was captured by medical CT scans at the beginning and end of the experiment. These scans, as well as the crania obtained post mortem, were scored using the mesowear method. Comparisons between diet groups showed few significant differences after 6 months, irrespective of whether CT scans or the real teeth were scored. Only when assessing the difference in signal between the beginning and the end of the experiment did relevant, significant diet-specific effects emerge. Diets containing lower phytolith content caused a more pronounced change in mesowear towards sharper cusps/higher reliefs, while the feed containing sand did not result in more extreme changes in mesowear when compared with the same feed without sand. Our experiment suggests that the formation of a stable and hence reliable mesowear signal requires more time to develop than 6 months.

10.1242/jeb.186411http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.186411