6533b870fe1ef96bd12d05d7
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Masculine Gender Role Stress
Willem A. ArrindellKatia Martı́nEllen O.h. BoomsAnnemarie M. KolkMaurits Kweesubject
AdultMaleDISORDERCoping (psychology)Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderPsychometricsAdolescentPersonality InventoryPsychometricsmedia_common.quotation_subjectSelf-conceptExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDysfunctional familyDISSIMULATIONDevelopmental psychologyPhobic disorderFEARSArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)phobic avoidanceCHECKERSmedicinePersonalityHumansIdentification PsychologicalMarriageAPPRAISALSCALEmedia_commonAgedMasculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) scalePERSONALITYGender Identityobsessive-compulsive behaviourFearpredictionMiddle Agedmedicine.diseasegender role stressSelf ConceptPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyPhobic DisordersFemaleSEXPersonality Assessment InventoryPsychologySocial psychologyAnxiety disorderStress Psychologicaldescription
Eisler and Blalock (Clin. Psychol. Rev. 11 (1991) 45) developed a cognitively mediated notion of Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) which assumes that rigid commitment to masculine schemata for appraisal and coping with life's problems may both produce stress and result in dysfunctional coping patterns in men. Previous findings obtained in a non-clinical sample pointed to the ability of the MGRS General scale to predict different forms of irrational fears. Using a predominantly psychologically distressed sample, the present study replicated this finding. In addition, different subordinate concepts of MGRS (Physical inadequacy, Emotional inexpressiveness, Subordination to women, Intellectual inferiority, and Performance failure) predicted Agoraphobic fears, Blood-Injury fears, Social fears, and Obsessional checking and washing compulsions distinctively. Intellectual inferiority was the strongest predictor of Social fears. Most MGRS measures emerged as better predictors of Checking than of Washing rituals. There were no sex differences in the predictive capabilities of any of the MGRS measures on any of the criterion measures. A hypothetical explanation is given for the observation of MGRS being more strongly predictive of Checking than of Washing rituals using the concept of "inflated responsibility". Implications for assessment, treatment and further studies are briefly pinpointed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-01-01 | Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry |