6533b870fe1ef96bd12d079d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cultural and psychological variables predicting academic dishonesty: a cross-sectional study in nine countries

Barbara CaciSadia MalikMenachem Ben-ezraMałgorzata TorójArun TipandjanPaweł KotAndrzej CudoRocco ServidioVioleta EneaKwaku Oppong AsanteSergio Alexis Dominguez-laraMichelle F. WrightAgata BłachnioNuworza Kugbey

subject

Settore M-PSI/01 - Psicologia GeneraleSocial Psychologyself-controlCross-sectional studymedia_common.quotation_subjectSocial value orientations0603 philosophy ethics and religionmedicine.disease_cause0502 economics and businessmedicineAcademic dishonestydistreGeneral Psychologymedia_commonAcademic dishonesty05 social sciences06 humanities and the artsSelf-controlPerfectionism (psychology)Distress060301 applied ethicsperfectionismPsychologySocial psychologyindependent self-construal050203 business & management

description

Academic dishonesty has serious consequences for human lives, social values, and economy. The main aim of the study was to explore a model of relations between personal and cultural variables and academic dishonesty. The participants in the study were N = 2,586 individuals from nine countries (Pakistan, Israel, Italy, India, the USA, Peru, Romania, Ghana, and Poland). The authors administered the Academic Dishonesty Scale to measure academic dishonesty, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale to measure distress, the Almost Perfect Scale – Revised to measure perfectionism, the Brief Self-Control Scale to measure self-control, and the Singelis Scale to measure independent self-construal. The results showed that the theoretical model was well fitted to the dataset in six countries: Pakistan, the United States, Romania, Ghana, Israel, and Poland. However, it was not well fitted in Italy, India, and Peru. Our results also showed that perfectionism significantly predicted academic dishonesty, but not in all countries. Self-control significantly predicted cheating, falsification, and plagiarism in the USA. Moreover, we found that distress was related to cheating o0nly in Ghana. Finally, independent self-construal predicted academic dishonesty. Our findings provide a cross-cultural contribution to the debate on academic dishonesty by highlighting its significant predictors and may inform interventions aimed at eliminating it. Our results can be used in preventing and curbing academic dishonesty. Knowledge on cross-cultural differences can be useful in international education for example, as an indicator accepting or relaxing attitude toward academic dishonesty in students from different countries.

10.1080/10508422.2021.1910826http://hdl.handle.net/10447/512294