6533b871fe1ef96bd12d0be4
RESEARCH PRODUCT
De Cratyle à la TME : une longue tradition dans le débat sur la motivation ou l’arbitraire des mots
Mihai Datsubject
[SHS.LITT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Literaturearbitrarinessmimophonyconventionalismenaturalismmimophonienaturalismearbitraire[ SHS.LITT ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Literature[SHS.LANGUE] Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics[SHS.LITT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Literaturemotivationconvent ionalism[ SHS.LANGUE ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics[SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/LinguisticsTheory of Matrices and Etymonsthéorie des matrices et des étymons.description
In the specialized literature, the concepts of motivation and arbitrariness refer to very different realities. Using some essential readings, we endeavour to clarify these points in the "motivated vs arbitrary nature of lexical forms" debate inaugurated in Plato's Cratylus. Amongst other things, these reveal that the lexical motivation phenomenon is more complex than the supporters of the Saussurian doxa of arbitrariness would have us believe. Even if a considerable amount of time separates the first forms of language from the most ancient linguistic forms available to us and any attempt to reconstruct these original forms is based upon an illusion, it is, nevertheless, possible to decipher the primitive principles of their formation.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-01-01 |