6533b871fe1ef96bd12d16ec
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A comparison of injection pain with articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin and lidocaine with adrenaline
Mahmut SumerFerhat MisirNuekhet CelebiMehtap Muglalisubject
articaineinferior alveolar block injectionlidocaineUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASSumer M. Misir F. Celebi N. Muglali M. -A comparison of injection pain with articaine with adrenaline prilocaine with phenylpressin and lidocaine with adrenaline- MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL cilt.13 2008maxillary local anesthesiainjection painprilocaine:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]description
Kutuk, Nukhet/0000-0001-6563-1899 WOS: 000259667200006 PubMed: 18587306 Objective: The objective of the present study was to investigate the pain on injection of articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin, and lidocaine with adrenaline. Study Design: The study sample was comprised of 497 consecutively seen patients received 497 maxillary buccal infiltration injections or inferior alveolar block injections of 4% articaine with 1: 200.000 adrenaline, 3% prilocaine with 1.08mcg phenylpressin, or 2% lidocaine with 1: 100.000 adrenaline. Immediately after the injection, patients were asked to rate their injection pain on a six-point scale. Results: There were no significant differences among the anesthetic solutions for injection pain. Patients usually reported mild or no injection pain for all of anesthetic administrations. Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study that lidocaine with adrenaline, articaine with adrenaline and prilocaine with phenylpressin seemed to be similar for pain on injection and they could be quite painless.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2008-01-01 |