6533b871fe1ef96bd12d2559
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted vs. open partial nephrectomy
Axel HaferkampAlexandre MottrieKaroline SchmitzStephan BuseCarolin Eva HachRene MagerPhillip Klumpensubject
medicine.medical_specialtyCost-Benefit Analysismedicine.medical_treatment030232 urology & nephrologyBiophysicsNephrectomy03 medical and health sciencesPostoperative Complications0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical ProceduresmedicineHumansOpen partial nephrectomyHospital CostsComputer-assisted surgerybusiness.industryDecision TreesPerioperativeCost-effectiveness analysisNephrectomyComputer Science ApplicationsSurgeryModels EconomicTreatment Outcome030220 oncology & carcinogenesisSurgeryLower costbusinessdescription
Background The cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) vs. the open procedure is not established. Methods We estimated in-hospital complications and the cost of RAPN vs. open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using an economic model. Costs incurred both intraoperatively and in hospital were considered. US data were extracted from existing literature. Results Mean in-hospital costs were $14,824 (95% CI $13,368-$16,898) for RAPN and $15,094 (95% CI $13,491-$17,140) for OPN. Complications after RAPN occurred in 23.3% (95% CI 20.0-25.8%) and after OPN in 36.1% (95% CI 35.6-36.6%) of the patients. In a sensitivity analysis, limited centre experience was associated with relevant increase in RAPN cost and consequently in low cost-effectiveness. Conclusions In this economic model based on US data, RAPN resulted in nominally lower cost but fewer perioperative complications than OPN. RAPN was not cost-effective in less experienced centres.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-07 | The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery |