6533b871fe1ef96bd12d26ef

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparative Study of Human and Automated Screening for Antinuclear Antibodies by Immunofluorescence on HEp-2 Cells

Marco CipollaRaja Marrakchi TrikiGiuseppe FrisciaVincenzo TaorminaDonato CascioHechmi LouzirAlessandro FauciGiuseppe RasoImen SfarAsma GatiIgnazio BruscaTaieb Ben AbdallahYoussra HaouamiMelika Ben AhmedTarak DhaouadiYousr GorgiAmel Benammar Elgaaied

subject

Statistics and ProbabilityPathologymedicine.medical_specialtyIndirect immunofluorescenceAnti-nuclear antibodymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryConcordanceHealth InformaticsIIfImmunofluorescenceHealth Professions (miscellaneous)Settore FIS/07 - Fisica Applicata(Beni Culturali Ambientali Biol.e Medicin)Continuous integrationPattern identificationAutoantibodies HEp-2 Immunofluorescence autoimmune diseases automated screening standardization.Health Information ManagementMedicineFine speckledbusiness

description

Background : Several automated systems had been developed in order to reduce inter-observer variability in indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) interpretation. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a processing system in antinuclear antibodies (ANA) screening on HEp-2 cells. Patients and Methods : This study included 64 ANA-positive sera and 107 ANA-negative sera that underwent IIF on two commercial kits of HEp-2 cells (BioSystems® and Euroimmun®). IIF results were compared with a novel automated interpretation system, the “ Cyclopus CADImmuno®” (CAD). Results : All ANA-positive sera images were recognized as positive by CAD (sensitivity = 100%), while 17 (15.9%) of the ANA-negative sera images were interpreted as positive (specificity = 84.1%), κ=0.799 (SD=0.045). Comparison of IIF pattern determination between human and CAD system revealed on HEp-2 (BioSystems®), a complete concordance in 6 (9.37%) sera, a partial concordance (sharing of at least 1 pattern) in 42 (65.6%) cases and in 16 (25%) sera the pattern interpretation was discordant. Similarly, on HEp-2 (Euroimmun®) the concordance in pattern interpretation was total in 5 (7.8%) sera, partial in 39 (60.9%) and absent in 20 (31.25%). For both tested HEp-2 cells kits agreement was enhanced for the most common patterns, homogenous, fine speckled and coarse speckled. While there was an issue in identification of nucleolar, dots and nuclear membranous patterns by CAD. Conclusion : Assessment of ANA by IIF on HEp-2 cells using the automated interpretation system, the “ Cyclopus CADImmuno®” is a reliable method for positive/negative differentiation. Continuous integration of IIF images would improve the pattern identification by the CAD.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.03.4