6533b872fe1ef96bd12d37e3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Behavioral changes over several successful agonistic encounters between male mice: Effects of type of “standard opponent”

Vicente M. SimónManuela MartinezAlicia Salvador

subject

Inter-male aggressionArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Isolation induced aggressionAggressionDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyAgonistic behaviourmedicineVictoryMale micemedicine.symptomPsychologySocial psychologyGeneral Psychology

description

This study assessed whether two types of non-aggressive “standard opponents” (“intact” and “anosmic” group-housed males) produced similar behavioral changes in isolated OF1 male mice given several experiences of victory. Experimental groups confronted either intact or anosmic opponents every two days until they had completed four encounters. The behavioral changes were recorded using a detailed ethologically inspired analysis. These changes were clearly different depending on the opponent type. When intact opponents were used, experimental subjects increased the time spent in digging, non-social exploration, explore from a distance, and attack over encounters, but showed decreased time spent in threat and a decreased latency to the first attack. In encounters with anosmic opponents, only declines in the latencies to threat and attack were noted. Moreover, the experimental groups differed in their behaviors over encounters. Those confronting intact opponents spent less time in social investigation, more time in explore from a distance and threat, and showed a shorter latencies to threat and attack than counterparts confronting anosmics. These results suggest that, although both types of “standard opponents” are similar in their non-aggressiveness, they elicit rather different behavioral responses in their adversaries. These findings provide additional support for the view that the type of opponent used in studies on intermale aggression is of paramount importance. Indeed, the use of different types of “standardized non-aggressive opponents” appears to be an important source of variability between studies. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:6<441::aid-ab2480200604>3.0.co;2-w