6533b872fe1ef96bd12d4313

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Was Frank Knight an institutionalist?

Pier Francesco AssoLuca Fiorito

subject

media_common.quotation_subjectEconomics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)Economic methodologyEconomic Methodologyjel:B41jel:B25Behaviourismjel:B15InstinctMeaning (philosophy of language)Settore SECS-P/04 - Storia Del Pensiero EconomicoPolitical Science and International RelationsInstitutionalismEconomicsKnightPositive economicsF. H. KnightInstitutionalismmedia_common

description

This paper critically examines Geoffrey Hodgson's recent provocative claim about Frank Knight as being a member of American institutionalism in the interwar years. In the first section of the paper the authors attempt to provide a definition of institutionalism and to emphasize its meaning from a historiographic point of view. The second and third sections analyze the two main methodological struggles between Knight and the institutionalists, namely, the debate during the early 1020s over the use of instinct theory as an explanation of economic behavior, and the subsequent campaign led by Knight in the late 1920s and early 1930s against the behaviorist wing of American institutionalism à la Copeland and Ayres. The fourth section deals with Knight's own brand of institutionalism. Our main conclusions are that, even if Knight's approach to the study of economic behavior shows some significant affinities with American institutionalism, he was not – both sociologically and in terms of his philosophical premises - an institutionalist.

10.1080/09538250701661822http://hdl.handle.net/10447/13729