6533b872fe1ef96bd12d4323

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Non-sutureless minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: mini-sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy: a series of 1130 patients

Roberto CoppolaKhalil FattouchGiuseppe SpezialeMarco MoscarelliChiara ComoglioGiuseppe NassoAlberto AlbertiniMauro Del Giglio

subject

MalePulmonary and Respiratory MedicineAortic valveAortic valve replacement • Exposure • Incision • Minimally invasive surgery • Surgery • Techniquemedicine.medical_specialtymedicine.medical_treatmentHeart Valve Diseases030204 cardiovascular system & hematologylaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineAortic valve replacementlawmedicineCardiopulmonary bypassHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresThoracotomyAgedRetrospective StudiesHeart Valve Prosthesis Implantationbusiness.industrySuture TechniquesAortic valve disorderRetrospective cohort studymedicine.diseaseSternotomySurgerymedicine.anatomical_structureThoracotomy030228 respiratory systemAortic ValveHeart Valve ProsthesisAortic valve surgeryFemaleSurgeryObservational studyCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinebusiness

description

Objectives Aortic valve replacement through conventional sternotomy still represents the gold-standard surgical approach for aortic valve disease. However, given the increasing number of patients with comorbidities, strategies that can improve operative results are always sought. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery, although related to a steep learning curve, might be associated with improved postoperative outcomes. The main aim of this study was to assess whether significant differences exist in terms of operative and early results between a mini-sternotomy and a right mini-thoracotomy approach for isolated aortic valve replacement without sutureless technologies. Methods This is an observational retrospective multicentre study from nine Italian cardiac centres that analyses prospectively collected data of patients who underwent isolated minimally invasive aortic valve replacement between January 2010 and December 2014. Two approaches are considered (mini-sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy) and compared in terms of operative and early outcomes. Results After interrogation of the centralized database, a total of 1130 patients were retrieved (854 mini-sternotomy and 276 mini-thoracotomy). Patients in the mini-sternotomy group had a higher risk profile. There was no difference in terms of early mortality; cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time did not differ significantly between the groups; and a significantly higher number of reoperations for bleeding was observed in the right mini-thoracotomy group. Conclusions Both mini-sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy could be performed safely, with low mortality and postoperative morbidity. The mini-thoracotomy approach was associated with a significantly higher rate of reoperation for bleeding. Uptake among cardiac centres was low. Sutureless technologies could potentially increase surgical volume by simplifying the mini-thoracotomy procedure.

10.1093/icvts/ivw104http://hdl.handle.net/10447/212019