6533b872fe1ef96bd12d439a
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Instant labeling of therapeutic cells for multimodality imaging
Kyung Oh JungHeike E. Daldrup-linkGuillem PratxLouise KiruAshok J. TheruvathAshok J. TheruvathWei WuAnna LiuHossein NejadnikTodd Sulcheksubject
SwineCellMedicine (miscellaneous)Multimodal Imaging030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingin vivo cell tracking03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineIn vivoFluorodeoxyglucose F18medicinemicrofluidic deviceAnimalsMagnetite NanoparticlesPharmacology Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)mechanoporationCells Culturedmedicine.diagnostic_testStaining and LabelingChemistryStem Cellsiron oxide nanoparticlesMagnetic resonance imagingTransfectionMagnetic Resonance Imaging18F-FDGmedicine.anatomical_structureAdipose TissuePositron emission tomography030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPositron-Emission TomographyStem cellIron oxide nanoparticlesEx vivoBiomarkersBiomedical engineeringResearch Paperdescription
Autologous therapeutic cells are typically harvested and transplanted in one single surgery. This makes it impossible to label them with imaging biomarkers through classical transfection techniques in a laboratory. To solve this problem, we developed a novel microfluidic device, which provides highly efficient labeling of therapeutic cells with imaging biomarkers through mechanoporation. Methods: Studies were performed with a new, custom-designed microfluidic device, which contains ridges, which compress adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) during their device passage. Cell relaxation after compression leads to cell volume exchange for convective transfer of nanoparticles and nanoparticle uptake into the cell. ADSCs were passed through the microfluidic device doped with iron oxide nanoparticles and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The cellular nanoparticle and radiotracer uptake was evaluated with DAB-Prussian blue, fluorescent microscopy, and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). Labeled and unlabeled ADSCs were imaged in vitro as well as ex vivo in pig knee specimen with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). T2 relaxation times and radiotracer signal were compared between labeled and unlabeled cell transplants using Student T-test with p 1 pg iron per cell) and 18F-FDG uptake (61 mBq/cell), with a labeling efficiency of 95%. The labeled ADSCs could be detected with MRI and PET imaging technologies: Nanoparticle labeled ADSC demonstrated significantly shorter T2 relaxation times (24.2±2.1 ms) compared to unlabeled cells (79.6±0.8 ms) on MRI (p<0.05) and 18F-FDG labeled ADSC showed significantly higher radiotracer uptake (614.3 ± 9.5 Bq / 1×104 cells) compared to controls (0.0 ± 0.0 Bq/ 1×104 cells) on gamma counting (p<0.05). After implantation of dual-labeled ADSCs into pig knee specimen, the labeled ADSCs revealed significantly shorter T2 relaxation times (41±0.6 ms) compared to unlabeled controls (90±1.8 ms) (p<0.05). Conclusion: The labeling of therapeutic cells with our new microfluidic device does not require any chemical intervention, therefore it is broadly and immediately clinically applicable. Cellular labeling using mechanoporation can improve our understanding of in vivo biodistributions of therapeutic cells and ultimately improve long-term outcomes of therapeutic cell transplants.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-05-01 | Theranostics |