6533b873fe1ef96bd12d4c7a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Evaluation of efficacy and biocompatibility of a novel semisynthetic collagen matrix as a dural onlay graft in a large animal model

Walter J. Schulz-schaefferGyörgy WéberJürgen WegmannAngelika GutenbergIldikó TakácsAxel NeulenAxel NeulenAlf GieseAlf Giese

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyExperimental ResearchBiocompatibilityDura materSus scrofaClinical NeurologyTissue integration610Biocompatible MaterialsMatrix (biology)Medicine & Public Health; Neurology; Interventional Radiology; Neuroradiology; Neurosurgery; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Surgical OrthopedicsExtracellular matrix03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineCollagen matricesDural substituteMaterials TestingmedicineAnimalsDuraplastyCerebrospinal fluid leakbusiness.industryBCMWatermedicine.diseaseDural defect repairCerebrospinal fluid leakExtracellular MatrixSurgerymedicine.anatomical_structureDuraGenCollagen matrix; Dural substitute; Dural defect repair; Duraplasty; Cerebrospinal fluid leak; BCM; DuraGen030220 oncology & carcinogenesisModels AnimalCollagen matrixFemaleTissue AdhesivesSurgeryCollagenDura MaterNeurology (clinical)businessCraniotomy030217 neurology & neurosurgeryLarge animal

description

Background Semisynthetic collagen matrices are promising duraplasty grafts with low risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas, good tissue integration and minor foreign body reaction. The present study investigates the efficacy and biocompatibility of a novel semisynthetic bilayered collagen matrix (BCM, B. Braun Aesculap) as dural onlay graft for duraplasty. Methods Thirty-four pigs underwent osteoclastic trepanation, excision of the dura, and placement of a cortical defect, followed by duraplasty using BCM, Suturable DuraGen™ (Integra Neuroscience), or periosteum. CSF tightness and intraoperative handling of the grafts were evaluated. Pigs were sacrificed after 1 and 6 months for histological analysis. Findings BCM and DuraGen™ showed superior handling than periosteum with a trend for better adhesion to dura and CSF tightness for BCM. Periosteum, which was sutured unlike the synthetic grafts, had the highest intraoperative CSF tightness. Duraplasty time with periosteum was significantly higher (14.4 ± 2.7 min) compared with BCM (2.8 ± 0.8 min) or DuraGen™ (3.0 ± 0.5 min). Tissue integration by fibroblast infiltration was observed after 1 month for all devices. More adhesions between graft and cortex were observed with DuraGen™ compared with BCM and periosteum. No relevant adhesions between leptomeninges and BCM were observed and all devices showed comparable lymphocytic reaction of the brain. All devices were completely integrated after 6 months. BCM and DuraGen™ showed a trend for an enhanced lymphocytic reaction of the brain parenchyma compared with periosteum. Implant rejection was not observed. Conclusion Semisythetic collagen matrices are an attractive alternative in duraplasty due to their easy handling, lower surgical time, and high biocompatibility.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1059-5