6533b874fe1ef96bd12d61c2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Evaluation of the primary stability in dental implants placed in low density bone with a new drilling technique, osseodensification: an in vitro study

Juan José Enciso-ripollMaría Dolores Gómez-adriánDavid Chávarri-pradoJavier Barberá-millánEsteban Pérez-pevidaCarolina Larrazábal-morón

subject

computer-assisted diagnosisMaterials scienceSwinecomputer-assisted image processingOsseointegrationDental Prosthesis Retentionradicular cysts03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineBone DensityOsseointegrationLow densityAnimalscomputer-assisted image analysisIn vitro studyTibiaGeneral DentistryUNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICASInternal connectionDental ImplantsResearchTwist drillDental Implantation EndosseousResonance Frequency Analysis030206 dentistryResonance frequency analysisTorqueOtorhinolaryngologykeratocystsodontogenic cystsSurgeryImplantImplantologyBiomedical engineering

description

Background Primary stability is an important key determinant of implant osseointegration. We investigated approaches to improve primary implant stability using a new drilling technique termed osseodensification (OD), which was compared with the conventional under-drilling (UD) method utilized for low-density bones. Material and Methods We placed 55 conical internal connection implants in each group, in 30 low-density sections of pig tibia. The implants were placed using twist drill bits in both groups; groups Under Drilling (UD) and Osseodensification (OD) included bone sections subjected to conventional UD and OD drilling, respectively. Before placing the implants, we randomized the bone sections that were to receive these implants to avoid sample bias. We evaluated various primary stability parameters, such as implant insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements. Results The results showed that compared with implants placed using the UD technique, those placed using the OD technique were associated with significantly higher primary stability. The mean insertion torque of the implants was 8.87±6.17 Ncm in group 1 (UD) and 21.72±17.14 Ncm in group 2 (OD). The mean RFA was 65.16±7.45 ISQ in group 1 (UD) and 69.75±6.79 ISQ in group 2 (OD). Conclusions The implant insertion torque and RFA values were significantly higher in OD group than in UD. Therefore, compared with UD, OD improves primary stability in low-density bones (based on torque and RFA measurements). Key words:Osseodensification, primary stability, low density bone, RFA.

10.4317/medoral.24231http://hdl.handle.net/10651/60012