Search results for " Filosofia del diritto"

showing 10 items of 630 documents

ALGUNAS REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA ARQUITECTURA DE LOS DERECHOS. ¿SON LOS LÍMITES INTERNOS DIFERENTES DE LOS EXTERNOS?

2022

Por lo general, cada derecho tiene como objetivo la protección de un interés (o un conjunto de intereses agrupados) de un solo sujeto. Sin embargo, es posible imaginar un derecho que se reconoce para proteger, al mismo tiempo, dos o más intereses distintos de dos o más sujetos distintos. Este capítulo se enfoca en los límites internos de los derechos que pueden derivar del conflicto que pueda suscitarse entre los dos o más intereses protegidos para de un derecho. Analizando tres derechos –los derechos parentales, el derecho a un medioambiente saludable y la libertad de expresión– el capítulo se pregunta si tales límites internos son una fachada cuyo comportamiento es equivalente al de los l…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittolimitinternal limitsrightSettore SPS/01 - Filosofia Politicafoundation
researchProduct

Per una democrazia liberale interventista

2022

In this article I'argument in favor of a liberal and interventionist democracy

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittoliverall democracy racism homophobia
researchProduct

Publicity and the Rule of Law

2021

By the ‘Rule of Law’ I mean a set of formal and institutional features the law may possess in varying degrees. These features define an ideal, which laws have traditionally been expected to live up to. One of these features is publicity. Part of what constitutes the Rule of Law is the requirement that the laws should be public. This is the subject of this paper. When it is claimed that the Rule of Law requires that the laws should be public, what is to be understood by this claim? My main claim is that the Rule of Law requirement of publicity is best understood in terms of the notion of common, or mutual, knowledge. When it is required that the laws should be public, what should be meant by…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomedia_common.quotation_subjectBusinessPublicityTransparency (behavior)Rule of Law Legality Publicity Common knowledge PrescriptionsLaw and economicsmedia_commonPromulgationRule of law
researchProduct

Conflicts between Fundamental Rights: a Criticism to Luigi Ferrajoli

2009

El objeto de este breve texto es poner de relieve alguna duda acerca de un específico, aunque no marginal, aspecto de la compleja teoría de los derechos fundamentales construida por Ferrajoli: el problema del conflicto entre derechos fundamentales. En primer lugar, ofreceré un sumario bastante genérico sobre la presencia (por lo menos aparente, o potencial) de conflictos entre derechos fundamentales en el panorama constitucional contemporáneo. De ahí pasaré a ilustrar la estrategia elaborada por L. Ferrajoli para argumentar la tesis de la ausencia o, al menos, la extremadamente reducida y marginal presencia de los conflictos entre derechos fundamentales. Por último, mostraré algunas posible…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomedia_common.quotation_subjectConflicts of rightsK201-487Fundamental rightsContext (language use)K1-7720ArtConflictos entre derechosDerechos fundamentalesPhilosophyconflicts of rightsLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudencePrima faciefundamental rightLuigi FerrajoliFundamental rightsJurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of lawLawHumanitiesFerrajoli LuigiLaw and economicsmedia_commonFilosofía del Derecho
researchProduct

Basic structure and tax havens

2012

In this paper I argue that Rawlsian Law of People (LP) is much more useful to the debate on international distributive justice than it is commonly assumed by many leading political philosophers (Pogge, Nussbaum, Sen, Beitz, Singer). I will show: 1) that these criticisms are misleading, insofar as they do not take the concept of basic structure seriously, and they reduce LP to an instance of ethical statism or of acritical acceptance of cultural pluralism; 2) that the basic domestic structures, and the principles that govern them, depend on the law of peoples and its principles as well. Therefore it is not true that each basic structure is independent of what occurs in the international fiel…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomedia_common.quotation_subjectDoctrineTax avoidanceFree ridingLuck egalitarianismJOHN RAWLS BASIC STRUCTURE TAX HAVENS DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICEStatismEconomicsNormativeDistributive justiceCultural pluralismLaw and economicsmedia_common
researchProduct

Some arguments supporting an interpretative approach to legal knowledge

2014

La scienza giuridica di matrice giuspositivista istituisce un legame stringente tra diritto e linguaggio. Secondo questa prospettiva, il diritto è il discorso del legislatore e la scienza giuridica non è altro che un discorso sopra un discorso: un meta-linguaggio descrittivo del linguaggio prescrittivo del legislatore. Questa concezione del diritto e questo modello di scienza giuridica sono in crisi da alcuni decenni. Nel mio saggio presento quattro argomenti volti a evidenziare i limiti di questo approccio al diritto: l’argomento epistemologico, l’argomento del pluralismo epistemologico, l’argomento della svolta interpretativa e, infine, l’argomento funzionalista. Questi argomenti non stan…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomedia_common.quotation_subjectLegal knowledgeOrthodoxyDescriptivismoConstructivismCiencia jurídicalegal knowledge descriptivism constructivism methodological pluralism interpretive turnLegal scienceciencia jurídica descriptivismo pluralismo metodológico giro interpretativoArgumentNothingEpistemological pluralismJurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of lawSocial scienceFilosofía del Derechomedia_commonDescriptivismscienza giuridica descrittivismo costruttivismo pluralismo metodologico svolta interpretativaInterpretive turnPhilosophyK201-487Legal knowledgeK1-7720Methodological pluralismEpistemologyPhilosophyLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceLegal positivismLawPluralismo metodológicoLegislatorGiro interpretativoDoxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho
researchProduct

METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL TO EVALUATE THE HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH IN PUBLIC POLICIES. A CASE STUDY OF OPEN GOVERNMENT PUBLIC POLICY IN MEXICO AND ITALY

2022

La investigación parte de la premisa de que para una mayor correspondencia de los procesos de política pública con los requerimientos de la sociedad contemporánea, éstos deben desarrollarse en un entorno policontextual y policéntrico. Es decir, en escenarios en los que se propicie su apertura a los diferentes contextos sociales y la intervención de diversos actores. En atención a esto, se optó por efectuar un estudio de tipo analítico-sintético, que involucrara las variables de enfoque de derechos humanos—relacionada con el policontextualismo y policentrismo de una acción— y la de política pública—relativa a la técnica/método conforme a la cual se desarrolla de forma sistemática la acción p…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittometodología:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO [UNESCO]UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHOderechos humanospublic policy human rights evaluation open governmentgobierno abierto
researchProduct

Non c’è diritto senza fiducia. In difesa di una concezione fiduciaria dl diritto

2022

The author critically discusses some main points of Tommaso Greco’s book La legge della fiducia. Greco distinguishes two models of law – the fiduciary model and the anti-fiduciary one – and supports the first model with good arguments. This review, while endorsing Greco’s conclusions, emphasizes some reason for perplexity and claims that the anti-fiduciary model of law helps to maintain a critical attitude towards the law.

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomoral obligationlegal normativityrules and principlelegal obligationtrust and law
researchProduct

Etica della popolazione. Paradossi, intuizioni e metodo

2020

This paper is an introduction to the contemporary debate on population ethics. As it is shown at the beginning, the paradoxes of population ethics do not pose a problem just for Utilitarianism, but also for everyone who shares a set of very common intuitions. Different proposals for a solution are described, each of which proves ineffective. At the end of the paper two different methods of moral reasoning are distinguished depending on whether accepting counter-intuitive conclusions is allowed or not.

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomoral psychologyconsequentialismJoshua Greenereflective equilibriumtrolley problem
researchProduct

Rivoluzione morale. Struttura, limiti e risorse nascoste del progetto filosofico di Joshua Greene

2020

This article analyzes Joshua Greene’s defense of a consequentialist approach to ethics, through a series of debunking arguments targeting characteristically deontological judgments and common-sense intuitions. This project is not new in ethics, but Greene develops his predecessors’ speculations by means of the recent findings in moral psychology. Greene’s conclusion is a moral revolution about the conception of harm and the duties to help strangers. The article focuses also on Frances Kamm and Guy Kahane’s critique to Greene’s theses and method. Kahane’s critique is used to give a subjectivist interpretation of Greene’s account which may constitute an unexplored answer to some methodologica…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomoral psychologyconsequentialismJoshua Greenereflective equilibriumtrolley problem
researchProduct