Search results for "60A99"

showing 10 items of 14 documents

On Contextuality in Behavioral Data

2015

Dzhafarov, Zhang, and Kujala (Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 374, 20150099) reviewed several behavioral data sets imitating the formal design of the quantum-mechanical contextuality experiments. The conclusion was that none of these data sets exhibited contextuality if understood in the generalized sense proposed in Dzhafarov, Kujala, and Larsson (Found. Phys. 7, 762-782, 2015), while the traditional definition of contextuality does not apply to these data because they violate the condition of consistent connectedness (also known as marginal selectivity, no-signaling condition, no-disturbance principle, etc.). In this paper we clarify the relationship between (in)consistent connectedness and (non…

Computer scienceGeneral MathematicsFOS: Physical sciencesGeneral Physics and Astronomy01 natural sciences050105 experimental psychology0103 physical sciences0501 psychology and cognitive sciencescontextuality010306 general physicsta515Cognitive scienceQuantum Physics05 social sciencesta111General Engineeringcyclic systemsArticlesKochen–Specker theorem81P13 81Q99 60A99 81P13 81Q99 60A99 81P13 81Q99 60A99Formal designFOS: Biological sciencesQuantitative Biology - Neurons and Cognitionconsistent connectednessNeurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
researchProduct

Probabilistic inferences from conjoined to iterated conditionals

2017

Abstract There is wide support in logic, philosophy, and psychology for the hypothesis that the probability of the indicative conditional of natural language, P ( if A then B ) , is the conditional probability of B given A, P ( B | A ) . We identify a conditional which is such that P ( if A then B ) = P ( B | A ) with de Finetti's conditional event, B | A . An objection to making this identification in the past was that it appeared unclear how to form compounds and iterations of conditional events. In this paper, we illustrate how to overcome this objection with a probabilistic analysis, based on coherence, of these compounds and iterations. We interpret the compounds and iterations as cond…

Indicative conditionalCounterfactual conditionalSettore MAT/06 - Probabilita' E Statistica MatematicaCompound conditionalInference02 engineering and technology050105 experimental psychologyTheoretical Computer ScienceArtificial Intelligence0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringFOS: Mathematics0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesEvent (probability theory)Discrete mathematicsApplied Mathematics05 social sciencesProbability (math.PR)Probabilistic logicConditional probabilityCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Mathematics - Logic03b48 60A99Settore MAT/01 - Logica MatematicaLogical biconditionalCenteringp-EntailmentIterated conditional020201 artificial intelligence & image processingCounterfactualLogic (math.LO)CoherenceSoftwareMathematics - Probability
researchProduct

Is there contextuality in behavioural and social systems?

2015

Most behavioral and social experiments aimed at revealing contextuality are confined to cyclic systems with binary outcomes. In quantum physics, this broad class of systems includes as special cases Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky-type, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell-type, and Suppes-Zanotti-Leggett-Garg-type systems. The theory of contextuality known as Contextuality-by-Default allows one to define and measure contextuality in all such system, even if there are context-dependent errors in measurements, or if something in the contexts directly interacts with the measurements. This makes the theory especially suitable for behavioral and social systems, where direct interactions of "everythin…

Matching (statistics)Class (set theory)Computer scienceGeneral Mathematicsinconsistent connectednessFOS: Physical sciencesGeneral Physics and AstronomyWorking hypothesisPublic opinion01 natural sciences050105 experimental psychology0103 physical sciencesFOS: Mathematicscontextuality0501 psychology and cognitive sciences010306 general physicsta515Quantum Physicsbusiness.industryOptical illusionProbability (math.PR)ta11105 social sciencescyclic systemsGeneral EngineeringKochen–Specker theorem81P13 81Q99 60A99 81P13 81Q99 60A99 81P13 81Q99 60A99Social systemFOS: Biological sciencesQuantitative Biology - Neurons and CognitionNeurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)Quantum Physics (quant-ph)businessSocial experimentMathematics - ProbabilityCognitive psychologyPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
researchProduct

Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization

2014

We compare two approaches to embedding joint distributions of random variables recorded under different conditions (such as spins of entangled particles for different settings) into the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory. In the contextualization approach each random variable is "automatically" labeled by all conditions under which it is recorded, and the random variables across a set of mutually exclusive conditions are probabilistically coupled (imposed a joint distribution upon). Analysis of all possible probabilistic couplings for a given set of random variables allows one to characterize various relations between their separate distributions (such as Bell-type ine…

Multivariate random variableFOS: Physical scienceslcsh:MedicineStability (probability)Joint probability distributionFOS: MathematicsMixture distributionStatistical physicslcsh:ScienceInverse distributionQuantum MechanicsProbabilityPhysicsta113Quantum PhysicsMultidisciplinaryModels StatisticalPhysicsProbability (math.PR)lcsh:RRandom Variables60A99 81P13Probability TheoryProbability DistributionAlgebra of random variablesEvents (Probability Theory)Sum of normally distributed random variablesPhysical SciencesQuantum Theorylcsh:QMarginal distributionQuantum EntanglementQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Mathematics - ProbabilityMathematicsResearch ArticlePlos One
researchProduct

No-Forcing and No-Matching Theorems for Classical Probability Applied to Quantum Mechanics

2013

Correlations of spins in a system of entangled particles are inconsistent with Kolmogorov's probability theory (KPT), provided the system is assumed to be non-contextual. In the Alice-Bob EPR paradigm, non-contextuality means that the identity of Alice's spin (i.e., the probability space on which it is defined as a random variable) is determined only by the axis \alphai chosen by Alice, irrespective of Bob's axis \betaj (and vice versa). Here, we study contextual KPT models, with two properties: (1) Alice's and Bob's spins are identified as Aij and Bij, even though their distributions are determined by, respectively, \alphai alone and \betaj alone, in accordance with the no-signaling requir…

PhysicsQuantum Physics010308 nuclear & particles physicsProbability (math.PR)Zero (complex analysis)General Physics and AstronomyFOS: Physical sciencesCharacterization (mathematics)Computer Science::Computational Complexity60A99 81P1301 natural sciencesCombinatoricsIdentity (mathematics)Probability theoryJoint probability distribution0103 physical sciencesFOS: MathematicsBeta (velocity)010306 general physicsQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Random variableMathematics - ProbabilitySpin-½
researchProduct

Proof of a Conjecture on Contextuality in Cyclic Systems with Binary Variables

2015

We present a proof for a conjecture previously formulated by Dzhafarov, Kujala, and Larsson (Foundations of Physics, in press, arXiv:1411.2244). The conjecture specifies a measure for the degree of contextuality and a criterion (necessary and sufficient condition) for contextuality in a broad class of quantum systems. This class includes Leggett-Garg, EPR/Bell, and Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky type systems as special cases. In a system of this class certain physical properties $q_{1},...,q_{n}$ are measured in pairs $(q_{i},q_{j})$; every property enters in precisely two such pairs; and each measurement outcome is a binary random variable. Denoting the measurement outcomes for a proper…

PhysicsQuantum PhysicsConjectureDegree (graph theory)Probability (math.PR)05 social sciencesBinary random variableFOS: Physical sciencesGeneral Physics and AstronomyBinary numberType (model theory)01 natural sciencesMeasure (mathematics)050105 experimental psychologyCombinatorics0103 physical sciencesFOS: Mathematics0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesQuantum Physics (quant-ph)81P13 81Q99 60A99010306 general physicsRandom variableMathematics - ProbabilityFoundations of Physics
researchProduct

Probabilistic foundations of contextuality

2017

Contextuality is usually defined as absence of a joint distribution for a set of measurements (random variables) with known joint distributions of some of its subsets. However, if these subsets of measurements are not disjoint, contextuality is mathematically impossible even if one generally allows (as one must) for random variables not to be jointly distributed. To avoid contradictions one has to adopt the Contextuality-by-Default approach: measurements made in different contexts are always distinct and stochastically unrelated to each other. Contextuality is reformulated then in terms of the (im)possibility of imposing on all the measurements in a system a joint distribution of a particul…

Pure mathematics(in)consistent connectednessmultimaximal couplingProperty (philosophy)Computer scienceGeneralizationFOS: Physical sciencesGeneral Physics and AstronomyDisjoint sets01 natural sciences050105 experimental psychologykontekstuaalisuusJoint probability distribution0103 physical sciencesFOS: Mathematicscontextuality0501 psychology and cognitive sciencescyclic systemcoupling010306 general physicsQuantum Physicskytkentäta114Probability (math.PR)ta11105 social sciencesProbabilistic logic16. Peace & justiceCoupling (probability)Kochen–Specker theoremQuantum Physics (quant-ph)81P13 81Q99 60A99Random variableMathematics - ProbabilityFortschritte der Physik
researchProduct

Contextuality in canonical systems of random variables

2017

Random variables representing measurements, broadly understood to include any responses to any inputs, form a system in which each of them is uniquely identified by its content (that which it measures) and its context (the conditions under which it is recorded). Two random variables are jointly distributed if and only if they share a context. In a canonical representation of a system, all random variables are binary, and every content-sharing pair of random variables has a unique maximal coupling (the joint distribution imposed on them so that they coincide with maximal possible probability). The system is contextual if these maximal couplings are incompatible with the joint distributions o…

Pure mathematicsGeneral MathematicsGeneral Physics and AstronomyBinary numberFOS: Physical sciencesContext (language use)01 natural sciences050105 experimental psychologydirect influencesJoint probability distribution0103 physical sciencesFOS: Mathematics0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesCanonical formcontextuality010306 general physicsCategorical variableta515MathematicsQuantum Physics05 social sciencesProbability (math.PR)ta111General EngineeringArticlesKochen–Specker theoremcanonical systemsIf and only ifdichotomizationmeasurementsQuantum Physics (quant-ph)81P13 81Q99 60A99Random variableMathematics - ProbabilityPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A : Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
researchProduct

Contextuality is About Identity of Random Variables

2014

Contextual situations are those in which seemingly "the same" random variable changes its identity depending on the conditions under which it is recorded. Such a change of identity is observed whenever the assumption that the variable is one and the same under different conditions leads to contradictions when one considers its joint distribution with other random variables (this is the essence of all Bell-type theorems). In our Contextuality-by-Default approach, instead of asking why or how the conditions force "one and the same" random variable to change "its" identity, any two random variables recorded under different conditions are considered different "automatically". They are never the…

Quantum Physics05 social sciencesProbabilistic logicFOS: Physical sciencesCondensed Matter Physics01 natural sciences050105 experimental psychologyAtomic and Molecular Physics and OpticsKochen–Specker theoremIdentity (mathematics)Joint probability distribution0103 physical sciences81P13 81P05 60A990501 psychology and cognitive sciences010306 general physicsQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Mathematical economicsRandom variableMathematical PhysicsVariable (mathematics)Physical lawMathematics
researchProduct

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for an Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems

2015

The notion of (non)contextuality pertains to sets of properties measured one subset (context) at a time. We extend this notion to include so-called inconsistently connected systems, in which the measurements of a given property in different contexts may have different distributions, due to contextual biases in experimental design or physical interactions (signaling): a system of measurements has a maximally noncontextual description if they can be imposed a joint distribution on in which the measurements of any one property in different contexts are equal to each other with the maximal probability allowed by their different distributions. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for th…

Quantum PhysicsClass (set theory)Property (philosophy)ta114Computer scienceSocial connectednessProbability (math.PR)ta111FOS: Physical sciencesGeneral Physics and AstronomyContext (language use)Electrical Engineering Electronic Engineering Information EngineeringKochen–Specker theoremkontekstuaalisuusMechanical systemJoint probability distributionFOS: MathematicscontextualityStatistical physicsElektroteknik och elektronikQuantum Physics (quant-ph)81P13 81Q99 60A99quantum mechanical systemsQuantumMathematics - ProbabilityPhysical Review Letters
researchProduct