Search results for "Bt"
showing 10 items of 1498 documents
Measurement of CP asymmetry in Bs0 → Ds ∓K± decays
2014
Journal of high energy physics 2018(3), 59 (2018). doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)059
Antagonism of the endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain AG1 to fungal pathogens that cause tracheomycotic deterioration of wine wood
2008
Grapevine trunk diseases can determine considerable losses in the worldwide wine industry. Symptoms of wood diseases are dead spurs, arms, cordons and same times vine death, due to cankers in the vascular tissue (Pascoe, 2000). Recent research has also showed a recrudescence either of escadisease or decay by Verticilliumdahliae and the occurrence of new wood alterations (Botryosphaeriarhodina; Mugnai et al., 1999; Wood et al., 2005; Bonfiglioliet al., 2007). Last investigations, carried out in Sicilian vineyards on fungi associated with xilematic“esca”symptoms, revealed the occurrence of genus Bacillusin wood tissues. A spore-producer Gram-positive bacterial isolate, named AG1, was identifi…
Situation en Mars 1976 des élèves sortis en juin 1975 des classes terminales de DUT, BTS, BEP, CAP
1978
référence interne : 78010
Astroteoloģiski prātojumi bioloģiskā universa hipotēzes un ārpuszemes dzīvības meklējumu perspektīvā
Raksts pamatā ir veltīts zinātnieku atziņām par inteliģentas ārpuszemes dzīvības iespējamību, izdarot no šādas hipotēzes tālākus konstruktīvus teoloģiskus secinājumus. Attiecīgi rakstam ir divas galvenās daļas – zinātniski-teorētiskā un konstruktīvi-teoloģiskā, un tas pieder zinātnes un reliģijas dialoga jomai. Dzīvība rakstā definēta mūsdienu bioloģijas izpratnē. Tiek apskatīti dzīvības rašanās scenāriji, ieskaitot spontānās rašanās un „panspermijas” alternatīvas, kā arī tiek apsvērtas „bioloģiskā determinisma” un no tā izrietošā „bioloģiskā universa” hipotēzes, kuru patiesuma gadījumā universā jābūt civilizācijām un būtnēm, kas attīstījušās nesalīdzināmi augstāk nekā cilvēki. Raksta teolo…
WHY IS IT NOT SO EASY FOR A PRESENT-DAY PHYSICIST TO BE GENUINELY A CHRISTIAN?
2021
A short description of the relationship between Physics, Philosophy and Theology is: Physics neglects or passes by Natural Realism, which is the origin of Philosophy. In turn, Natural Realism is backed up by Judeo-Christian revelation. Therefore, Physics neglects or passes by Theology. That relationship between Physics and Theology is widely used as a background for exercising an intense pressure on Theology. The defence of Theology should begin by pointing out certain shortcomings of Physics and formulating a philosophical control of these shortcomings. This is tantamount to turning Physics instead of Theology into a “site under construction”. Only a “controlled” Physics and Theology are a…
A Case of Human Reason’s Liberation from its Positivist Self- Limitation. The Return of Philosophy Through the Solution of a Problem of Physics is a …
2020
The idea of human reason’s positivist self-limitation is used by Benedict XVI and others to characterize an aspect of the long-lasting intellectual situation of Western technological-scientific civilization. Liberating human reason from its positivist self-limitation requires, in general, an overcoming of the historical process of Natural Science’s drifting away from Philosophy. In the case of Physics, it requires a point where both physics and philosophy have to deal together with the same problem. This paper first identifies a problem caused by specific reductionisms in Physics. These reductionisms cause certain deformations of physical knowledge, which in turn makes it desirable for phys…
Tro och Naturvetenskap - den förlorade harmonin
2004
In Christian Theology, on the one hand, and Physics, on the other, exist different views about the age of the universe, the age of the earth, and about particularities of other historical events. Obviously, this is a serious obstacle for a harmonious relationship between both. Much more serious, however, is the difference between the respective epistemological climates. The epistemological climate of Theology is ”luminous” because it relies on common sense. On the contrary, the epistemological climate of Physics is ”dark”, insofar it deviates from common sense. The goal of the article is to emphasize the importance of addressing that difference. The text is in Swedish.
Warum ist es nicht so einfach für einen heutigen Physiker, durch und durch Christ zu sein?
Eine kurze Beschreibung des Verhältnisses von Physik, Philosophie und Theologie lautet: Die Physik vernachlässigt oder umgeht den natürlichen Realismus, Ursprung allen Philosophierens. Der natürliche Realismus wird wiederum durch die jüdisch-christliche Offenbarung gestützt. Daher vernachlässigt oder umgeht die Physik die Theologie. Diese Beziehung zwischen Physik und Theologie wird häufig als Hintergrund für die Ausübung eines starken Drucks auf die Theologie verwendet. Die Verteidigung der Theologie sollte damit beginnen, auf bestimmte Mängel der Physik hinzuweisen und eine philosophische Kontrolle dieser Mängel zu formulieren. mit wird die Physik statt der Theologie zur "Baustelle". Nur …
Why is it not so easy for a prsent-day physicist to be genuinely a Christian?
2019
A short description of the relationship between Physics, Philosophy and Theology is: Physics neglects or passes by Natural Realism, which is the origin of Philosophy. In turn, Natural Realism is backed up by Judeo-Christian revelation. Therefore, Physics neglects or passes by Theology. That relationship between Physics and Theology is widely used as a background for exercising an intense pressure on Theology. The defence of Theology should begin by pointing out certain shortcomings of Physics and formulating a philosophical control of these shortcomings. This is tantamount to turning Physics instead of Theology into a “site under construction”. Only a “controlled” Physics and Theology are a…
What is the Main Reason that Physics and Theology Do Not Really Match? What Can Be Done to aAmend that Situation?
2020
Abstract: The first main point is that Physics and Christian Theology are moving in opposite epistemological climates, when they are speaking about the same common object. Here both terms are important: opposite – which is nothing special – and epistemological climate – which is very special. Epistemological questions are considered difficult and normally bypassed. The second main point is that a possible amendment of that situation consists in trying to get a control of the cognitive losses of Physics.