Search results for "Constitutionality"

showing 9 items of 9 documents

La Carta sociale europea come parametro interposto nella recente giurisprudenza costituzionale: novità e questioni aperte

2019

In two judgments delivered in 2018 (No. 120 and No. 194), the Constitutional Court for the first time referred to provisions of the European Social Charter as an interposed norm in the constitutional review of primary laws. The two judgments, however, leave two questions open. First, in judgment No. 120, the Court recognizes taht the European Social Charter may complement Article 117, paragraph 1, of the Constitution, as it constitutes a natural integration of the European Conventionof Human Rights on the social level, which in fact distinguishes it from "ordinary" international agreements. In its subsequent judgment No. 194, on the other hand, the Court speaks of treaties with constitution…

Constitutional Court European Social Charter res interpretata interposed parameter International Law CommissionIUS/13 - DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALESettore IUS/13 - Diritto InternazionaleEuropean Social Charter Constitutional Court res interpretata stare decisis parameter of constitutionalityComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences
researchProduct

Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Futurein Legal Systems II: Collection of Research Papers in Conjunction with the 7th International Scienti…

2020

Criminal law:LAW/JURISPRUDENCE [Research Subject Categories]Improving the quality of legislationHuman libertyAbolition of serfdom in the BalticsDevelopment of private lawEU lawInternational human rightsInternational public rightsConstitutionality of the stateInternational private law
researchProduct

The Infra-Constitutionality of European Law in Romania and the Challenges of the Romanian Constitutional Culture

2016

This article deals with European Law as a legal transplant facing the Romanian constitutional culture, in the context of constitutionally limiting the Romanian State’s sovereignty as a member of the EU. Consequently, the reception of the EU law into the Romanian constitutional system (and culture) is determined by two paradoxically divergent Romanian legal-cultural traits: on the one hand, the necessity (bearing accents of national legal pride) to cherish and fructify the Romanian legal (constitutional) traditions, reified, as I shall denominate, as ‘the adapted Romanian law’, and stipulated in the 2003 amended Constitution as a ‘tradition firewall’ / ecran de traditionalite. On the other h…

European Union lawConstitutionRomanianmedia_common.quotation_subjectConstitutionalismlanguage.human_languageLegal transplantConstitutionalityLawPolitical sciencelanguageConstitutional courtLegal culturemedia_common
researchProduct

Educación diferenciada por razón de sexo en España: Reflexiones sobre los derechos y libertades educativas desde la perspectiva constitucional y de l…

2021

Gender-separate education, understood as a pedagogical model that provides separate schooling for boys and girls, has been subject to legal and public scrutiny for the past thirty years. Nonetheless, it has not been until 2018 that this educational option was put into the spotlight, especially regarding its constitutionality and compatibility with arts. 1.1, 9.2 and 14 of the Spanish Constitution, which constitute a manifestation of the principles of equality and non-discrimination, while at the same time trying to balance it with art. 27 of said constitutional text, with respect to the right to education and freedom to choose and create educational centers. Against this backdrop, the prese…

Gender-separate educationHuman rightsConstitutionmedia_common.quotation_subjectRight to educationPrinciple of equalityEducational freedomsConstitutional stateRight to educationThe artsEducación diferenciada por sexosDerecho a la educaciónLibertades educativasConstitutionalityEscuelas no mixtasPolitical scienceSingle-sex schoolsPrincipio de igualdadHumanitiesCultural pluralismmedia_commonLex Social: Revista de Derechos Sociales
researchProduct

El enaltecimiento del terrorismo: desde el caso de Juana Chaos a César Strawberry. La recepción de la doctrina constitucional en la jurisprudencia de…

2020

The paper deals with the impact of the first ruling of the Constitutional Court on glorification of terrorism (112/2016) in the interpretation of this offence by the Supreme Court, which demands hermeneutically requirements absent from the literality of art. 578 of the Criminal Code and that the Constitutional Court required in its previous case law on hate speech, recently reiterated in the ruling 35/2020 of the Constitutional Court. Firstly, the text addresses the initial description of the elements of this criminal figure by the Supreme Court and its characterization as public defence without incitement, as opposed to the definition of the crime of public provocation to terrorism in the …

Sociology and Political ScienceLegal doctrineCommon lawCriminal codeIncitementSupreme courtConstitutionalityLawPolitical scienceTerrorismConstitutional courtLawTerrorismeDiscurs de l'odiDret constitucional
researchProduct

IL LEGISLATORE TEDESCO ALLARGA LE MAGLIE DELLA REVISIONE CONTRA REUM: L'ASSOLUZIONE PER DELITTI GRAVI E IMPRESCRITTIBILI PUÒ ESSERE MESSA IN DISCUSSI…

2022

Il legislatore tedesco ha ampliato il novero dei casi di revisione in peius. Ha previsto la possibilità di impugnare una sentenza definitiva di assoluzione per omicidio o crimini internazionali, qualora – in base a nuovi fatti o mezzi di prova – emergano “ragioni stringenti” per una condanna. La riforma ha già sollecitato dubbi di legittimità costituzionale e, per la sua rilevanza, suscita varie riflessioni.

The German legislator has enlarged the cases of in peius revision. It is now provided the possibility to challenge a final acquittal for murder or international crimes when “compelling grounds” for a conviction emerge on the basis of new facts or means of evidence. The reform has already posed doubts of constitutionality and due to its relevance raises various reflections.Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penale
researchProduct

La ���circoscritta (e puntellata) area��� di incostituzionalit�� dell���art. 580 c.p. fra self-restraint della Corte costituzionale e perdurante iner…

2020

With the decision on the ���Cappato case��� the Constitutional Court did not create the right to medically assisted suicide, which, moreover, the constitutional order does not contemplate, but only identified a ���circumscribed area��� of unconstitutionality of art. 580 of the Italian Criminal Code, supporting it with regulatory and procedural props. In this way, the Court demonstrated its self-restraint respectful of Parliament���s discretion and underlined the persistence of the need for legislative intervention in such a sensitive matter.

assisted suicidedeclaration of unconstitutionalitySettore IUS/08 - Diritto CostituzionaleParliament’s discretionadditive decisionEnd-of-life
researchProduct

Crowdfunding y Financiación de Partidos Políticos

2019

Crowdfunding is presented as a new private financial resource for parties of political parties by which citizens can participate economically in the structure of these organizations. This paper will set out some legal proposals that seek to adequately incorporate this new resource. First, we will approach the crowdfunding analysis in order to make it easier for the reader to understand this phenomenon. Secondly, it will analyze the current implementation of this tool by political parties at national and international level, pointing out some of the positive and negative aspects that can be derived from the use of this new resource. All this, with the main objective of analyzing the viabilit…

crowdfundingSociology and Political Sciencefinanciación políticaPartits políticsProportionality (law)lcsh:KJ-KKZaportación finalista.lcsh:Law of EuropePoliticsResource (project management)Order (exchange)Constitutionalitylcsh:K1-7720Phenomenonlcsh:Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudencepartidos políticosBusinessLawDret constitucionalLaw and economicsRevista de Derecho Político
researchProduct

W kwestii pominięcia przez sąd administracyjny niekonstytucyjnych przepisów ustawy

2021

W publikacji przedstawiono podstawy orzekania przez sąd administracyjny z pominięciem przepisu ustawy, który ten sąd ocenia jako niekonstytucyjny. Tym samym podejmuje problematykę realizacji podstawowego celu, jakim jest ukazanie roli sądownictwa administracyjnego w ostatecznym ukształtowaniu praw i obowiązków adresata działań administracji jako gwaranta ochrony praw jednostki, która mogłaby zostać pozbawiona ochrony prawnej na etapie stosowania prawa przez podmiot dysponujący władztwem administracyjnym (imperium). Rolę tę zaprezentowano w aspekcie orzekania przez sądy administracyjne w sytuacji, gdy TK uznał normy zawarte w przepisie poddanego jego kontroli aktu za niekonstytucyjne, a któr…

unconstitutionalitypytanie prawnejudicial controlConstitution RPlegal questionsądyjudicialKonstytucja RPkontrola sądowaniekonstytucyjnośćDyskurs Prawniczy i Administracyjny
researchProduct