Search results for "Deliberation"

showing 10 items of 63 documents

Linking News Value Theory With Online Deliberation: How News Factors and Illustration Factors in News Articles Affect the Deliberative Quality of Use…

2018

Previous research suggests that distinct characteristics of news articles, such as their news factors, account for the different participation rates in comment sections as well as the degree of interactivity among the discussants. In this study, this assumption is tested in the Facebook environment and extended to the analysis of how news factors (i.e., event characteristics) and illustration factors (i.e., characteristics resulting from a specific journalistic editing) of news articles predict the inclusiveness of discussions, as well as the occurrence of civility, rationality, and deliberative interactivity in user comments. A content analysis of 619 news articles and 11,218 related user…

Linguistics and LanguageCommunicationmedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciences050801 communication & media studies050109 social psychologyDeliberationAffect (psychology)Language and LinguisticsIncivility0508 media and communicationsNews valuesOnline deliberation0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesJournalismQuality (business)InformationSystems_MISCELLANEOUSPsychologySocial psychologymedia_commonCommunication Research
researchProduct

Negotiating digital surveillance legislation in post-Snowden times : An argumentation analysis of Finnish political discourse

2019

Abstract In the digital era, when security agencies world-wide have been challenging basic democratic principles with massive data gathering, Finland has had a different approach: it has conducted no large-scale surveillance of citizens’ online activities. Now, however, the country is planning such a vast expansion of state surveillance that the constitution itself must be altered. The present article examines one key point in this legislative process to see how the new surveillance measures are argued for and criticized, and how the differing points of view are negotiated to ultimately enable political action. Drawing particularly on Fairclough and Fairclough’s (2012) approach to argumenta…

Linguistics and LanguageHistoryNational securityverkkovalvontaSociology and Political Sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectLegislationta6121Public administrationprivacyArgumentation theoryPoliticspolitiikkaargumentationPolitical sciencediskurssiyksityisyysmedia_commonConstitutionbusiness.industrycritical discourse studiespolitical discourseDeliberationDemocracydigital surveillancediskurssianalyysiNegotiationargumentointibusinessJournal of Language and Politics
researchProduct

COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION: A CONTEMPORARY CONTRIBUTION OF BRAZILIAN BIOETHICS TO THE SUS' (UNIFIELD HEALTH SERVICE) PRACTICES

2017

Resumo Este ensaio teve por objetivo analisar a necessidade de nova excelência profissional pautada na deliberação coletiva, debatendo a ética aplicada às questões de saúde nas experiências de Brasil e Espanha. O funcionamento prático dos comitês de bioética na Espanha avança na constituição do método deliberativo como participação coletiva na decisão profissional, discutindo a importância da democracia deliberativa para a construção de nova civilidade ética. No Brasil, após as primeiras décadas de construção do Sistema Único de Saúde, amplia-se o leque de participação dos profissionais, primeiramente nos conselhos de saúde e, com a resolução CNS n. 196/96, também nos comitês de ética em pe…

Medicine (General)030504 nursingexcelência profissionalprofessional excellenceexcelencia profesionaldeliberaçãoEducation (General)solidariedade críticadeliberacióndeliberation03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinecritical solidarityR5-920democracia deliberativasolidaridad crítica030212 general & internal medicineL7-991bioética0305 other medical sciencebioethicsdeliberative democracy
researchProduct

Unusual business or business as usual: An investigation of meeting support requirements in multilateral diplomacy

1993

Abstract The concept of supporting meetings at the same time and at the same place with computers raises the problem of how salient features of group behaviors are understood in meetings. In this paper we critically examine some aspects of meeting behaviors. We point out that the idea of small, cohesive business teams is not necessarily a valid starting point in thinking of all meeting support. In particular, beliefs that relate to user aspects, group features such as composition, structure and protocols, and task characteristics such as nature, importance, and goals in meetings may need deliberation in many group decision support systems (GDSS) interventions. To demonstrate the credibility…

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementDecision support systemEngineeringProcess (engineering)business.industrymedia_common.quotation_subjectContext (language use)Library and Information SciencesPublic relationsDeliberationManagement Information SystemsTask (project management)Management of Technology and InnovationCredibilityMandatebusinessSocial structureInformation Systemsmedia_commonAccounting, Management and Information Technologies
researchProduct

Enseigner la rhétorique à l’École de Bruxelles

2021

Cet article expose la conception de l’enseignement de la rhétorique à l’École de Bruxelles. Il explique l’origine de la démarche dans la pensée de Perelman. Il montre ensuite comment l’équipe du GRAL a retrouvé l’enseignement des exercices de rhétorique par les sophistes. Il propose une réflexion épistémologique pour montrer la spécificité de cet enseignement. Il termine enfin par l’exposé d’un exercice de délibération conçu et animé par les membres du GRAL. This paper outlines the conception of the teaching of rhetoric at the Brussels School. It explains the origin of the approach in the thought of Perelman. It then shows how the GRAL team recovered the teaching of rhetorical exercises by …

Perelmanexercicesexercisesdeliberationteaching of rhetoricsophistsenseignement de la rhétoriqueenseignement de la rhétorique Perelman exercices sophistes délibérationsophistesdélibérationGeneral MedicineSettore M-FIL/05 - Filosofia E Teoria Dei Linguaggi
researchProduct

Racionalismo y emotivismo en perspectiva neuroética

2017

El desarrollo de la neuroética ha tendido a privilegiar el papel de la emoción en detrimento del razonamiento en la deliberación moral. En esta comunicación deseo contraponer dos modelos de deliberación moral que se han articulado desde la neuroética: uno de corte emotivista, desarrollado por Haidt y Lakoff y otro, pretendidamente racionalista, elaborado recientemente por Hugo Mercier. Mi objetivo es determinar si Mercier lleva realmente a cabo una rehabilitación del razonamiento en la neuroética o si, por el contrario, su planteamiento es deudor del de los enfoques emotivistas. PALABRAS CLAVE: neuroética, Lakoff, Haidt, Mercier, deliberación.

PhilosophyEmotivismPhilosophyMoral deliberationFilosofiaNeuroethicsPrivilege (social inequality)Epistemology
researchProduct

Thinking about Brexit with Cristina Lafont

2020

In this comment on Cristina Lafont’s new book Democracy without Shortcuts, I apply some of her ideas to the Brexit case in order to show that her identification of problematic shortcuts has significant analytical potential when it comes to understanding contemporary challenges to democracy. I argue that the push for Brexit can be viewed as a response to ‘expertocratic’ shortcuts in European Union decision-making, while David Cameron’s attempt to resolve the conflict once and for all by referendum constituted a ‘proceduralist’ shortcut. I conclude by asking whether Lafont’s suggestion to ‘constitutionalize’ discourses and decisions could also imply seeking a meta-deliberative assessment of …

PhilosophyIdentification (information)Sociology and Political ScienceBrexitOrder (business)Political sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectDeliberationDemocracymedia_commonLaw and economicsPhilosophy & Social Criticism
researchProduct

WHEN DEDUCTION LEADS TO BELIEF

1995

The paper questions the common assumption that rational individuals believe all propositions which they know to be logical consequences of their other beliefs: although we must acknowledge the truth of a proposition which is a deductive consequence of our beliefs, we may not genuinely believe it. This conclusion is defended by arguing that some familiar counterexamples to the claim that knowledge is justified true belief fail because they involve propositions which are not really believed. Beliefs guide conduct or issue in assertion by answering questions which arise in the course of deliberation and conversation, but the troublesome cases present propositions which do not present the agent…

PhilosophyTheoryofComputation_MATHEMATICALLOGICANDFORMALLANGUAGESmedia_common.quotation_subjectAssertionConversationPropositionRationalityPsychologyDeliberationLogical consequenceCounterexamplemedia_commonEpistemologyRatio
researchProduct

En respuesta al comentario de Carlos Pereda sobre Un lugar para la moral

2004

Carlos Pereda califica mi concepción de la moral de realismo particularista y objeta a mi defensa tanto del realismo como del particularismo. En mi respuesta trato de mostrar cómo nuestras discrepancias en torno al papel de los principios en la deliberación moral es, excepto en un punto crucial, cuestión de énfasis. No ocurre lo mismo, sin embargo, con mi reivindicación del realismo moral, pues parte de lo que intento mostrar en el libro es que los programas constructivistas de los que habla Pereda no pueden pensarse coherentemente. 

Philosophymedia_common.quotation_subjectPhilosophyMoral deliberationMoralityMoral realismRealismmedia_commonEpistemologyCrítica (México D. F. En línea)
researchProduct

Marcos mentales: ¿marcos morales? Deliberación pública y democracia en la neuropolítica

2018

En este trabajo trato de abordar el concepto de «marco mental» como clave para entender la concepción que la neuropolítica tiene de la deliberación pública y la democracia. En un primer lugar expondré los puntos centrales de las teorías de Jonathan Haidt y George Lakoff sobre el marco mental y la deliberación pública. Después pondré en relación la idea del marco mental con el concepto de «marco referencial» de Taylor. Finalmente, analizaré críticamente el modelo de deliberación pública y de democracia que cabe extraer del concepto de marco mental en la neuropolítica.

Philosophyneuropolithics; mental frame; Lakoff; public deliberation; democracyPhilosophymedia_common.quotation_subjectMoral deliberationDeliberationRelation (history of concept)neuropolítica; marco mental; Lakoff; deliberación pública; democraciaHumanitiesSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)media_commonRecerca: revista de pensament i anàlisi
researchProduct