Search results for "Freedom"

showing 10 items of 458 documents

Libertà personale e libertà di circolazione tra emergenza presente e incertezza futura

2023

The article deals with the notion of personal freedom as it is regulated by art. 13 of Italian Constitution, drawing the main differences with other fundamental rights, in particular with the freedom of movement (art. 16 Cost.). To this end, the paper explores the main doctrinal orientations and the most recent constitutional case-law on the subject; specifically, it proposes a reading of the motivational points of the judgment n. 127 of 2022 of the Italian Constitutional Court which resolved some touchy issues of constitutionality that arose during the pandemic emergency. In conclusion, the text questions, with a look at the near future, on the usability of traditional tools for the protec…

Settore IUS/08 - Diritto CostituzionalePersonal freedom Freedom of movement Constitutional Court judgment n. 127/2022 pandemic emergency
researchProduct

Disinformation and Hate Speech: A European Constitutional Perspective

2020

What balance should be struck between freedom of expression, as an essential right and value of any democratic society, and other constitutional rights when facing falsehood and extreme speech? How are Europe and legislators around the world reacting to the rise of online disinformation and hate speech, in the wake of mounting evidence of adverse effects on democratic processes? What is the most effective approach to address and tackle harmful practices over the Internet, if any? These are some of the pivotal questions that this book seeks to explore.

Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionaledisinformation hate speech the right to freedom of expression
researchProduct

Parole e potere. Libertà d'espressione, hate speech e fake news

2017

indagine in tema di libertà di espressone che parte dalle origini del costituzionalismo contemporaneo e si muove poi lungo le coordinate relative alla giurisprudenza della Corte suprema statunitense e delle Corti europee, nel processo di transizione dell’esercizio di diritti e libertà fondamentali dal mondo degli atomi a quello dei bit. investigation on the subject of freedom of expression that starts from the origins of contemporary constitutionalism and then moves along the coordinates relating to the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the European Courts, in the transition process of the exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms from the world of atoms to that of bits.

Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionalefreedom of expression - Constitutionalism - European courts - US supreme court - rights - fundamental freedomsliberta di espressione - Costituzionalismo - corti europee - corte suprema USA - diritti - libertà fondamentali
researchProduct

Il valore costituzionale della buona informazione

2022

Is there a constitutional right to good information? In the age of the internet and digital platforms, this question becomes more urgent and more pressing. In the debate in the Constituent Assembly already emerged the need for a control on sources of information, a requirement that, however, did not find a formulation expressed in Art. 21stof the Italian Costitution. It speaks only of a possible intervention of the legislator aimed at making known the «means of financing the periodic press». Nevertheless, the constitutional culture of contemporary democracies brings with it the idea of a reliance on the individual in the quality of the information he receives and thus raises the question of…

Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionalefreedom of speech disinformation fake newslibertà di espressione disinformazione fake news
researchProduct

La “detenzione amministrativa” degli stranieri irregolari nell’ordinamento italiano e dell’Unione europea ed il diritto fondamentale di ogni persona …

2013

AdmInIstratIve Detention of Irregular Foreigners in Italy and in the European Union and the Fundamental Human Right to Personal Freedom and Proper Defense. Foreigners are particularly subject to the restriction of personal freedom. A great number of countries resort to the detention of irregular migrants and asylum seekers by reason of the violation of immigration laws, including irregularly crossing the State border, using false document, non-possession of identification documents, staying after the permit of stay has expired, etc.. In Italy and in other member States of the European Union we can notice an ordinary use of administrative detention of foreigners (without authorization to ent…

Settore IUS/10 - Diritto AmministrativoAdmInIstratIve Detention Irregular Foreigners Italy European Union Fundamental Human Rights Personal Freedom Proper DefenseDetenzione amministrativa stranieri irregolari ordinamento italiano Unione europea diritti fondamentali libertà personale tutela giurisdizionale
researchProduct

PROCEDURA AMMINISTRATIVA, FUNZIONI DI GOVERNO E LIBERTÀ FONDAMENTALI NELLA "VICENDA DICIOTTI"

2019

This paper addresses some considerations on the administrative discipline of the procedure for the identification of the "place of safety" and the functional link between the Minister’s conduct and the activity actually carried out by the Minister; finally the compatibility between the ministerial nature of kidnapping (and the alleged existence of "an important public interest") with the protection of fundamental freedoms

Settore IUS/10 - Diritto AmministrativoPlace of safety kidnapping fundamental freedoms
researchProduct

Religious confession privilege in Italy

2021

In Italy, the secrecy of confession practised in some religious denominations and especially in the [Roman] Catholic Church, is widely recognised. Indeed, it is so widely recognised that it is not perceived as a particular concession to religion, even less as a privilege, but rather as a to religious freedom guaranteed by art 19 of the Constitution of the Italian (‘Italian Constitution’ or ‘Constitution’) which is a subjective and public right since it can be enforced against the state. In other words, this protection of religious belief and action in the Italian Constitution denies that the state may limit religious confession and the secrecy of that confession by law or administrative act…

Settore IUS/11 - Diritto Canonico E Diritto EcclesiasticoSeal of the confessional protection of religious freedom in Italy religion confession privilege in Italian Constitution and Codes
researchProduct

Five Years of the Citizens Directive in the UK - Part 2

2011

This two-part article reviews how the UK authorities have fared in the practical application of Directive 2004/38/EC in the five years since it entered into force. It identifies and examines the most common problems faced by EU citizens when seeking to have their rights recognised by the UK authorities applying the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 by reference to questions and complaints received by Your Europe Advice. In examining the experience of EU citizens and their family members living in the UK, account is taken of a number of recent judgments of the European Court of Justice concerning EU citizenship, including Metock, Lassal, Eman & Sevinger and Ruiz Zambrano.…

Settore IUS/14 - Diritto Dell'Unione EuropeaEuropean Union Union citizenship free movement of persons freedom of establishment freedom to provide services immigration United Kingdom Gibraltar Channel Islands Isle of Man Directive 2004/38/EC Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006Unione europea cittadinanza dell'Unione libera circolazione delle persone libertà di stabilimento libera prestazione dei servizi immigrazione Regno Unito direttiva 2004/38/CE
researchProduct

The Protection of the Right of Freedom on the European Union Level: The European Arrest Warrant and Non-custodial Pre Trial Measures. The Guideline o…

2013

"Protection of fundamental rights in particular must be central to the operation of the system": la formula, adoperata al culmine del più recente documento valutativo sull’esperienza del MAE (2011), ben sintetizza, sul piano dell'indirizzo politico, il progressivo spostamento degli accenti logici, dalla prospettiva dell'efficienza e della sicurezza a quella della primazia della tutela dei diritti individuali, dell'intero quadrante delle misure limitative della libertà individuale in ambito UE. I vissuti del principio di proporzionalità divengono, per questa via, paradigmi di fondo per la lettura del sistema in termini di applied law: i tre livelli attraverso i quali il filtro di proporziona…

Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenalePrinciple of ProportionalityEuropean Arrest WarrantNon-custodial Pre Trial MeasureRight of Freedom
researchProduct

Il delitto di "caporalato" tra diritti minimi della persona e tutela del mercato del lavoro

2020

Il contributo analizza il reato di intermediazione illecita e sfruttamento lavorativo, offrendo un’analisi comparata con il sistema repressivo tedesco. Lo studio si sofferma, in particolare, sui limiti di legittimazione del diritto penale nella punizione dei fatti di “caporalato”, nel tentativo di scongiurare che l’intervento repressivo nelle dinamiche economiche e contrattuali, di natura sinallagmatica, possa assumere una portata tale da porsi in contrasto con il canone della sussidiarietà. A tal fine, si suggerisce una prospettiva ermeneutica che incentri il disvalore penale del reato di cui all’art. 603-bis c.p. sulla lesione dei diritti fondamentali del lavoratore – riconducibili agli a…

Settore IUS/17 - Diritto PenaleThe paper analyses the offence of unlawful work intermediation and exploitation offering a comparative analysis with the German punitive system. The study focuses in particular on the limits of legitimacy of criminal law in the punishment of gangmaster acts in the attempt to avoid that the punitive intervention in economic and contractual dynamics of a mutual nature could be so intrusive to be in contrast with the principle of subsidiarity. To this end the author suggests an interpretative perspective that centres the penal disvalue of the offence under article 603-bis of the criminal code on the harm to fundamental workers’ rights – as linked to articles 4 35 and 36 of the Italian Constitutions – which work as a limit to entrepreneurial freedom. To be sure the indexes of exploitation listed by the criminalising norm seem to echo those fundamental human rights attributed to a person as a worker: those very same rights that – when harmed in their minimal and therefore intangible dimension – legitimise the intervention of the ius terribile. The article also stresses the protection of the job market: in this sense the offence – even if situated within the Kernstrafrecht – represents a new paradigm of the institutional response within the framework of the contemporary relationships between law and economics.
researchProduct