Search results for "clause"

showing 10 items of 244 documents

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA): What Kind of Space is Given to Fair Trade and Labour Rights?

2017

Il presente lavoro analizza da una prospettiva giuslavoristica il Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), trattato internazionale di libero scambio, da poco sottoscritto da Unione Europea e Canada: il saggio si interroga se tale trattato possa contribuire o meno allo sviluppo del fair trade all'interno delle democrazie occidentali. Nel dettaglio l'articolo analizza le clausole del CETA alla luce dei core labour standards dell'ILO, con un focus sulle clausole arbitrali di risoluzione delle controversie (Investor-State Dispute Settlement), sulle forme di partecipazione della società civile e sui meccanismi di eccezione. Nelle conclusioni, nonostante la tendenziale omogeneità socio-…

CETA – diritti sociali fondamentali internazionalmente riconosciuti – arbitrato degli investimenti – meccanismi di eccezione – free trade – fair tradeSettore IUS/07 - Diritto Del LavoroCETA – international labour standards – ISDS clause – exceptions mechanisms – free trade – fair trade
researchProduct

Le contentieux de la rupture abusive de relations d'affaires établies entre dans le champ d'application de la clause compromissoire stipulée dans le …

2012

International audience; (Civ. 1re, 8 juillet 2010, n° 09-67.013, D. 2010. 2884, obs. X. Delpech, note M. Audit et O. Cuperlier ; ibid. 2540, obs. Centre de droit de la concurrence Yves Serra ; ibid. 2933, obs. T. Clay ; Rev. crit. DIP 2010. 743, note D. Bureau et H. Muir Watt ; cette Revue 2011. 667, obs. P. Delebecque ; Rev. arb. 2010. 513, note R. Dupeyré)

CONCURRENCEArbitrage international[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/LawRupture des relations commerciales[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawDessaisissementPratique anticoncurrentielleARBITRAGELoi de policeJuridiction étatiqueClause compromissoire
researchProduct

Le compromis d'arbitrage n'est pas une clause susceptible d'être déclarée abusive

2012

International audience; (Civ. 1re, 25 février 2010, Guichard c/ Association générale de prévoyance militaire vie, D. 2010. 651 ; ibid. 2933, obs. T. Clay ; ibid. 2011. 974, obs. H. Aubry, E. Poillot et N. Sauphanor-Brouillaud ; RTD civ. 2010. 323, obs. B. Fages ; RTD com. 2010. 774, obs. B. Bouloc ; Rev. arb. 2011. 139, note J. El Adhab ; RDC 2010. 886, obs. N. Sauphanor- Brouillaud)

CONSOMMATIONArbitrage[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Law[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawProtection du consommateurAssuranceClause abusiveClause compromissoire
researchProduct

EFFICIENCY AND JUSTICE IN EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW

2008

Abstract: In the last century, refl ections on contract law have been almost entirely dominated by classical contract theory and laissez–faire ideology, while open considerations of effi ciency and justice have played a marginal role. The rise of European contract law has gradually led to the abandonment of traditional arguments typical of national private laws and has sparked a growing debate on effi ciency and justice. This trend does not always contribute to the quality of the debate, as it is often ideologically polarized between ‘right wing’ arguments pleading in favour of marketoriented polices and ‘left wing’ arguments in support of consumers’ rights, both proposing solutions inspir…

CONTRACT EUROPEAN LAW EFFICIENCY JUSTICE PENALTY CLAUSELaw
researchProduct

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo

2021

The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9, 2020 comes to answer the five questions that, in its preliminary question, the Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clauses, establishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16, 2017, in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement and, subsequently, those of April 11, 2018 and September 13, 2018 in the opposite direction, declaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and in…

Carolina del Carmen The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9and its economic repercussion - as well as its procedural significance. -by the consequence of the lifting of procedural suspensions that its dictation supposes2018 in the opposite direction2017consumidorin its preliminary question2018 and September 13cláusula suelothe Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clausesno doubtpacto novatorioagreed as a result of the ruling of the Luxembourg Court-. In this paper I will review the doctrine contained in the STJUE in its comparison with the one previously declared by our Supreme Courtremunerative interestMortgage:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]in attentioninterest variability 132 159consumerestablishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16new agreementsubsequentlyboth to its well-founded substantive relevance - due to the legal doctrine that it consolidates and which results from unquestionable applicationvariabilidad del interés.2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730055 Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo Castillo Martínezdeclaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and insistently commented resolution after its publication2020 comes to answer the five questions thatthose of April 11in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement andin order to conclude what its incidence is with respect to the criterion maintained by our High Court in its Judgments of April 11UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASfloor clauseinterés remuneratorio2018. Hipoteca
researchProduct

De quelques conséquences du divorce sur la dissolution de la communauté

2011

International audience

CessationEffet[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/LawCOMMUNAUTE ENTRE EPOUX[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawClause de reprise des apportsDivorceCohabitationQualificationCollaborationComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSCommunauté universelle
researchProduct

Décès d'un associé : absence d'effet rétroactif de l'agrément de l'héritier et pouvoirs du gérant pendant la procédure

2018

International audience; Note sous Cour de cassation (com.), 3 mai 2018, n° 15-20.851 (F-P+B)

Clause d'agrémentCESSION DE DROITS SOCIAUXPart sociale[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/LawCapital social[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawRefus d'agrémentAgrémentSociété à responsabilité limitéeHéritier
researchProduct

Difficile interprétation de l'exigence de mention du « prix offert » dans la demande d'agrément

2017

International audience; Note sous Cour de cassation (com.), 11 janvier 2017, n° 15-13.025 (F-D), Sté Couly Dutheil Holding c/ C.

Clause d'agrémentCESSION DE DROITS SOCIAUXPrix offert[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Law[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawDemande d'agrémentSociété anonymeActions
researchProduct

Clause de fixation du prix a dire de tiers. Contrat de bail. Qualification, Clause d'arbitrage (non), Caractère contractuel de l'estimation

1998

International audience; (Cass. 3e civ., 4 mars 1998, Melleret c/ Laurent Pinsonnet, RJDA 5/1998, n° 662)

Clause de fixation du prix à dire de tiers[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Law[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawBailCONTRAT ET OBLIGATIONSCaractère contractuel
researchProduct

Revendication. Ventes successives. Délivrance d'un bien déjà détenu par l'acheteur. Conditions d'opposabilité de la clause de réserve de propriété

2013

International audience; (Com., 3 juillet 2012, n° 11-20.425, arrêt n° 758 F-P+B, Sté Delta machines c/ Sté Serop Concept et a., D. 2012. 1815, obs. A. Lienhard ; ibid. 2548, chron. J. Lecaroz, H. Guillou et F. Arbellot ; RTD civ. 2012. 557, obs. P. Crocq ; LPA 6 déc. 2012, p. 8, note C. Quézel-Ambruna)

Clause de réserve de propriétéAcceptation[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/LawRevendication[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawSAUVEGARDE DES ENTREPRISESSauvegarde
researchProduct