Search results for "delibera"
showing 10 items of 143 documents
Marcos mentales: ¿marcos morales? Deliberación pública y democracia en la neuropolítica
2018
En este trabajo trato de abordar el concepto de «marco mental» como clave para entender la concepción que la neuropolítica tiene de la deliberación pública y la democracia. En un primer lugar expondré los puntos centrales de las teorías de Jonathan Haidt y George Lakoff sobre el marco mental y la deliberación pública. Después pondré en relación la idea del marco mental con el concepto de «marco referencial» de Taylor. Finalmente, analizaré críticamente el modelo de deliberación pública y de democracia que cabe extraer del concepto de marco mental en la neuropolítica.
Political Discussion in Modern Democracies
2010
1. Introduction: Political Discussion in Modern Democracies from a Comparative Perspective Michael R. Wolf and Ken'ichi Ikeda Part 1: Deliberation and Discussion as the Object of Analysis 2. Dissecting Deliberative Democracy: A Review of Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings Andre Bachtiger and Seraina Pedrini 3. The Equality Paradox of Deliberative Democracy: Evidence from a National Deliberative Poll Kasper Moller Hansen 4. What Political Discussion Means and How Do the French and (French-Speaking) Belgians Deal with It? Sophie Duchesne and Florence Haegel 5. Participatory Budgeting, Discussion Networks and Political Information in Two Brazilian Cities Lucio R. Renno and Barry Ames …
Defending democracy against technocracy and populism : deliberative democracy's strengths and challenges
2020
Hans Kelsen and Practical Reason
2017
The critique of practical reason, in all its possible forms, has a far more important and decisive role in Kelsen’s thought than the rejection of Natural law doctrine. Admitting that a practical use of reason is legitimate, namely, that there is a possible connection between intellect and will, would mean destroying the whole foundation of the scientific undertaking of the Pure Theory of law and its conception of the legal norm, which is its central aspect. By depriving practical reason of all foundation, any reference to agency and practical deliberation is excluded from Kelsen’s theory of law. Consequently, the Ought loses all capacity of attraction and motivation of human action, renderi…
Teaching Argumentation Theory and Practice: The Case of 12 Angry Men
2011
The aim of this contribution is to illustrate how the pragmadialectical model of critical discussion may be explained and studied with the jurors' deliberations in the film 12 Angry Men. The film itself may be understood as an argument by example, and to defend this idea we take into consideration the thesis that the filmmaker wants to establish, the constraints of the medium, and the three classical perspectives on argumentation.
Quality assurance of decision-making in conversations between professionals and non-professionals: identifying the presence of deliberative principles
2012
The ideal of dialogue is at stake in professional conversations. The aim of this study is to develop an instrument that makes it possible to compare principles of deliberation with what actually takes place in professional conversations. The developed instrument is tested on one patient's conversation with his doctor about lifestyle changes, and meetings where pupils with learning disabilities and their parents discuss further schooling with school representatives. Although in need of refinement, the conclusion is that the instrument provides meaningful insight into how much each participant 'contributes' to the decision-making process and 'behaves' during the conversation.
Los bienes comunes como aproximación materialista al problema del bien común: una réplica a Ermanno Vitale
2021
Este artículo pretende ser una réplica a alguno de los planteamientos críticos que ha desarrollado Ermanno Vitale contra las teorías de los bienes comunes, especialmente contra las teorías benecomunistas que han florecido en el debate político y académico italiano. En particular, pretende responder a una conferencia pronunciada por el filósofo italiano en diciembre de 2020 –cuyo texto se reproduce en este mismo número de la revista–, en la que propuso rechazar las doctrinas de los comunes, en favor de la clásica noción del bien común. Aquí se sostendrá que, en realidad, las teorías de los comunes constituyen la única estrategia interesante para replantear el concepto de bien común en la act…
Foreword
2018
Commento agli artt. 612-615 c.p.p.
2005
Si commentano gli artt. 612-615 del codice di procedura penale in tema di ricorso per cassazione, mettendo in evidenza le questioni giurisprudenziali più controverse alla luce anche degli orientamenti dottrinali più accreditati sulla sospensione dell'esecuzione della condanna civile, sulla partecipazione dei difensori, sulle peculiarità del dibattimento, nonché sulla deliberazione e pubblicazione della sentenza.
International Bioethics Committees: Conditions for a Good Deliberation
2016
One of the most relevant effects of bioethics emergence has been the spread of deliberative bodies on bioethics matters. Their features are very wide, depending upon the entity that creates them, their regional scope, the issues they deal with, the ruling strength of their agreements, etc. Among them, international bioethics committees are particularly relevant due to the huge impact of their work on global public opinion, as well as on the policies approved by governments all around the world. These bodies are presumed to adopt their decisions, as well as the other bioethics committees, after deliberating on facts and values (Gracia 2001).