Search results for "diritto romano"
showing 10 items of 308 documents
Vadimonium e cautio se exhibiturum in D. 2.9.2.1 (Paul. 6 ad ed.)
2015
Stipulationsklage mit unbestimmtem (actio ex stipulatu) und bestimmtem Klageninhalt (condictio)
2023
This part of the Handbook of Roman Private Law analyses actions arising from stipulatio having as their object an incertum (actio incerti ex stipulatu) or a certum (condictio) as well as perpetuatio obligationis.
L’actio in factum come surrogato dell’azione di ripetizione? A proposito di Iul. 60 dig. D. 39.6.18.1 e Iav. 13 epist. D. 19.5.10
2021
The study touches upon the theme of the relationship between condictio and actio in factum in the matter of innominate contracts. More precisely, the question arises whether the atio in factum could have performed a merely repetitive function, rather than lead to the protection of the negative interest. In this regard the author deals with Iul. 60 dig. D. 39.6.18.1 and Iav. 13 epist. D. 19.5.10, on the subject of donatio mortis causa and (quasi-)usufruct respectively. What the two texts have in common is the fact that in both cases the use of an actio in factum pretoria (pursuant to Gai 4.46) is envisaged in a purely repetitive function and that for both cases a relationship with the issue …
Tutela di un patto di restituzione della dote a mezzo di condictio in C. 5.14.1 e C. 2.3.10
2021
Il contributo si occupa di analizzare la questione della possibilità di tutelare a mezzo di condictio il patto di restituzione concluso in continenti all'atto di costituzione della dote così come risulta da due rescritti imperiali tramandati nel Codice di Giustiniano.
Due brani a confronto in tema di testamenti factio (cum testibus): D. 28.1.20.2 (Ulp. 1 ad Sab.) e I. 2.10.9
2018
The research compares two texts of Justinian’s compilation: D. 28.1.20.2 (Ulp. 1 ad Sab.) and I. 2.10.9, that provide two different solutions to the problem if the father and the brother of an filius familias in potestate who makes a will de castrensi peculio can be considered testes idonei in his will. The author formulates questions on the reasons for this dissent under two different profiles: why, in the Institutiones, the Justinian’s compilers (probably, Theophilus) propose a determination, ictu oculi, opposite to that reported in the Digesta? What motivations justify the existence on the point of a probable dispute among the jurists?
Lauro Chiazzese, Confronti testuali. Contributo alla dottrina delle interpolazioni giustinianee. Parte speciale (Materiali)
2018
Sui nomina ‘consequentia ... rebus’ in I. 2.7.3
2019
Moving from the comparison between I. 2.7.3 e C. 5.3.20, the A. questions the meaning of the short passage ‘nos ... consequentia nomina rebus esse studentes constituimus ...’ reported in I. 2.7.3, from which the maxim ‘nomina sunt consequentia rerum’ would reasonably be derived.
Agere 'ex asse in solidum' e agere 'pro parte in solidum'. Per un'interpretazione di Venul. 7 stip. D. 10, 2, 7
2020
The paper proposes a revised analysis of D. 10.2.7 (Venul. 7 stip.), from which it seems reasonable to suggest that Venuleius discussed a particular kind of co-inheritance: the coniunctim attribution of a hereditas or an inheritance quota regarding two heirs. The substantially classical text, which can be glimpsed therein, offers evidence of the coexistence of different patterns of co-inheritance in classical private Roman law.
CONTRAHERE E ANIMUS CONTRAHENDI IN SALVIO GIULIANO
2022
The paper deals with the category of negotium in Salvius Iulianus. The author rejects the thesis according to which the jurist would have developed a concept of negotium as an objective relationship between two distinct assets. From the examination of Iul. 15 dig. D. 18.5.5 and Iul. 18 dig. D. 12.1.20 has rather taken shape the image of a jurist attentive to the will of the contracting parties, in the determination of id quod actum est.
Sul valore delle espressioni ‘dicis gratia’ e ‘dicis causa’ nel linguaggio dei giuristi
2015
Auctor de locutionibus ‘dicis gratia’ ac ‘dicis causa’ in iurisperitorum lingua significationem inuestigat. Haec uocabula forsitan propria iurisconsultorum ueteris sermonis sunt (arg. ex Varro de ling. Lat. 6.61). Non est inverisimile quod Gaius (in Gai 1.141, 1.190, 2.103-104, 2.252) illorum uerborum pristinum ualorem resonat. The A. investigates the meaning of the terms ‘dicis gratia’ and ‘dicis causa’ in the legal sources. Probably these expressions belong to the ancient Roman legal lexicon (arg. ex Varro de ling. Lat. 6.61). In the jurisprudential texts [Gai 1.141, 1.190, 2.103 and 104, 2.252, D. 13.6.4 (Gai. 1 de verb. obl.), 29.5.1.34 (Ulp. 50 ad ed.)] dicis gratia and dicis causa do …