Search results for "group theory"

showing 10 items of 703 documents

On the Structure of Bispecial Sturmian Words

2013

A balanced word is one in which any two factors of the same length contain the same number of each letter of the alphabet up to one. Finite binary balanced words are called Sturmian words. A Sturmian word is bispecial if it can be extended to the left and to the right with both letters remaining a Sturmian word. There is a deep relation between bispecial Sturmian words and Christoffel words, that are the digital approximations of Euclidean segments in the plane. In 1997, J. Berstel and A. de Luca proved that \emph{palindromic} bispecial Sturmian words are precisely the maximal internal factors of \emph{primitive} Christoffel words. We extend this result by showing that bispecial Sturmian wo…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesGeneral Computer ScienceSpecial factorDiscrete Mathematics (cs.DM)Computer Networks and CommunicationsApproximations of πFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryEnumerative formula68R15Characterization (mathematics)Minimal forbidden wordTheoretical Computer ScienceCombinatoricsComputer Science::Discrete MathematicsEuclidean geometryPhysics::Atomic PhysicsMathematicsChristoffel symbolsApplied MathematicsPalindromeSturmian wordSturmian wordComputer Science::Computation and Language (Computational Linguistics and Natural Language and Speech Processing)Combinatorics on wordsComputational Theory and MathematicsWord (group theory)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata TheoryChristoffel wordComputer Science - Discrete Mathematics
researchProduct

On Block Sensitivity and Fractional Block Sensitivity

2018

We investigate the relation between the block sensitivity bs(f) and fractional block sensitivity fbs(f) complexity measures of Boolean functions. While it is known that fbs(f) = O(bs(f)2), the best known separation achieves $${\rm{fbs}}\left( f \right) = \left( {{{\left( {3\sqrt 2 } \right)}^{ - 1}} + o\left( 1 \right)} \right){\rm{bs}}{\left( f \right)^{3/2}}$$ . We improve the constant factor and show a family of functions that give fbs(f) = (6−1/2 − o(1)) bs(f)3/2.

FOS: Computer and information sciencesGeneral Mathematics010102 general mathematicsBlock (permutation group theory)0102 computer and information sciencesComputational Complexity (cs.CC)01 natural sciencesConstant factorCombinatoricsComputer Science - Computational Complexity010201 computation theory & mathematicsSensitivity (control systems)0101 mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematics
researchProduct

All Classical Adversary Methods Are Equivalent for Total Functions

2017

We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity fbs( f ). That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is equivalent to a simpler lower bound, which we call rank-1 relational adversary. For partial functions, we show unbounded separations between fbs( f ) and other adversary bounds, as well as between the adversary bounds themselves. We also show that, for partial functions, fractional block sensitivity canno…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesKolmogorov complexity010102 general mathematicsBlock (permutation group theory)0102 computer and information sciencesFunction (mathematics)Computational Complexity (cs.CC)Adversary01 natural sciencesUpper and lower boundsTheoretical Computer ScienceCombinatoricsComputer Science - Computational ComplexityComputational Theory and Mathematics010201 computation theory & mathematicsPartial functionSensitivity (control systems)0101 mathematicsEquivalence (measure theory)MathematicsACM Transactions on Computation Theory
researchProduct

On prefix normal words and prefix normal forms

2016

A $1$-prefix normal word is a binary word with the property that no factor has more $1$s than the prefix of the same length; a $0$-prefix normal word is defined analogously. These words arise in the context of indexed binary jumbled pattern matching, where the aim is to decide whether a word has a factor with a given number of $1$s and $0$s (a given Parikh vector). Each binary word has an associated set of Parikh vectors of the factors of the word. Using prefix normal words, we provide a characterization of the equivalence class of binary words having the same set of Parikh vectors of their factors. We prove that the language of prefix normal words is not context-free and is strictly contai…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesPrefix codePrefix normal wordPre-necklaceDiscrete Mathematics (cs.DM)General Computer ScienceFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)Binary numberComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryContext (language use)Binary languageLyndon words0102 computer and information sciences02 engineering and technologyPrefix grammarprefix normal formsKraft's inequalityCharacterization (mathematics)Lyndon word01 natural sciencesPrefix normal formenumerationTheoretical Computer ScienceFOS: Mathematics0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringMathematics - CombinatoricsMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsprefix normal words prefix normal forms binary languages binary jumbled pattern matching pre-necklaces Lyndon words enumerationbinary jumbled pattern matchingSettore INF/01 - InformaticaComputer Science (all)pre-necklacesComputer Science::Computation and Language (Computational Linguistics and Natural Language and Speech Processing)prefix normal wordsPrefix010201 computation theory & mathematics020201 artificial intelligence & image processingCombinatorics (math.CO)binary languagesComputer Science::Formal Languages and Automata TheoryWord (group theory)Computer Science - Discrete MathematicsTheoretical Computer Science
researchProduct

Primitive sets of words

2020

Given a (finite or infinite) subset $X$ of the free monoid $A^*$ over a finite alphabet $A$, the rank of $X$ is the minimal cardinality of a set $F$ such that $X \subseteq F^*$. We say that a submonoid $M$ generated by $k$ elements of $A^*$ is {\em $k$-maximal} if there does not exist another submonoid generated by at most $k$ words containing $M$. We call a set $X \subseteq A^*$ {\em primitive} if it is the basis of a $|X|$-maximal submonoid. This definition encompasses the notion of primitive word -- in fact, $\{w\}$ is a primitive set if and only if $w$ is a primitive word. By definition, for any set $X$, there exists a primitive set $Y$ such that $X \subseteq Y^*$. We therefore call $Y$…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesPrimitive setDiscrete Mathematics (cs.DM)General Computer ScienceFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)Pseudo-repetitionComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory0102 computer and information sciences02 engineering and technology01 natural sciencesTheoretical Computer ScienceCombinatoricsCardinalityFree monoidBi-rootFOS: Mathematics0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringMathematics - CombinatoricsRank (graph theory)Primitive root modulo nMathematicsHidden repetitionSettore INF/01 - InformaticaIntersection (set theory)k-maximal monoidFunction (mathematics)Basis (universal algebra)010201 computation theory & mathematics020201 artificial intelligence & image processingCombinatorics (math.CO)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata TheoryWord (group theory)Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
researchProduct

Sensitivity versus block sensitivity of Boolean functions

2010

Determining the maximal separation between sensitivity and block sensitivity of Boolean functions is of interest for computational complexity theory. We construct a sequence of Boolean functions with bs(f) = 1/2 s(f)^2 + 1/2 s(f). The best known separation previously was bs(f) = 1/2 s(f)^2 due to Rubinstein. We also report results of computer search for functions with at most 12 variables.

FOS: Computer and information sciencesSequenceComputational complexity theoryBlock (permutation group theory)Computational Complexity (cs.CC)Computer Science ApplicationsTheoretical Computer ScienceCombinatoricsComputer Science - Computational ComplexitySignal ProcessingTheory of computationSensitivity (control systems)Boolean functionAlgorithmComputer searchInformation SystemsMathematics
researchProduct

Open and Closed Prefixes of Sturmian Words

2013

A word is closed if it contains a proper factor that occurs both as a prefix and as a suffix but does not have internal occurrences, otherwise it is open. We deal with the sequence of open and closed prefixes of Sturmian words and prove that this sequence characterizes every finite or infinite Sturmian word up to isomorphisms of the alphabet. We then characterize the combinatorial structure of the sequence of open and closed prefixes of standard Sturmian words. We prove that every standard Sturmian word, after swapping its first letter, can be written as an infinite product of squares of reversed standard words.

FOS: Computer and information sciencesSequenceFibonacci numberDiscrete Mathematics (cs.DM)Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)Sturmian wordStructure (category theory)Sturmian wordInfinite productComputer Science::Computation and Language (Computational Linguistics and Natural Language and Speech Processing)Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory68R15CombinatoricsPrefixComputer Science::Discrete MathematicsCombinatorics on words Sturmian wordFOS: MathematicsMathematics - CombinatoricsClosed wordsCombinatorics (math.CO)SuffixWord (group theory)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata TheoryMathematicsComputer Science - Discrete Mathematics
researchProduct

Constructing Antidictionaries in Output-Sensitive Space

2021

A word $x$ that is absent from a word $y$ is called minimal if all its proper factors occur in $y$. Given a collection of $k$ words $y_1,y_2,\ldots,y_k$ over an alphabet $\Sigma$, we are asked to compute the set $\mathrm{M}^{\ell}_{y_{1}\#\ldots\#y_{k}}$ of minimal absent words of length at most $\ell$ of word $y=y_1\#y_2\#\ldots\#y_k$, $\#\notin\Sigma$. In data compression, this corresponds to computing the antidictionary of $k$ documents. In bioinformatics, it corresponds to computing words that are absent from a genome of $k$ chromosomes. This computation generally requires $\Omega(n)$ space for $n=|y|$ using any of the plenty available $\mathcal{O}(n)$-time algorithms. This is because a…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesSettore ING-INF/05 - Sistemi Di Elaborazione Delle InformazioniOutput sensitive algorithmsString algorithmsPhysicsAntidictionarieSettore INF/01 - InformaticaOutput sensitive algorithm0102 computer and information sciencesAbsent wordsSpace (mathematics)01 natural sciencesAntidictionariesCombinatorics010201 computation theory & mathematicsTheoryofComputation_ANALYSISOFALGORITHMSANDPROBLEMCOMPLEXITYData compressionComputer Science - Data Structures and AlgorithmsData Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)Computer Science::Symbolic Computation[INFO]Computer Science [cs]Absent wordAlphabetWord (group theory)2019 Data Compression Conference (DCC)
researchProduct

The infinite dihedral group

2022

We describe the infinite dihedral group as automaton group. We collect basic results and give full proofs in details for all statements.

FOS: Mathematics20F65 (Primary) 05C25 20E08 68Q70 13F25 (Secondary)Computer Science::Symbolic ComputationGroup Theory (math.GR)Nonlinear Sciences::Cellular Automata and Lattice GasesMathematics - Group TheoryComputer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Languages with mismatches and an application to approximate indexing

2005

In this paper we describe a factorial language, denoted by L(S, k,r), that contains all words that occur in a string 5 up to k mismatches every r symbols. Then we give some combinatorial properties of a parameter, called repetition index and denoted by R(S,k,r), defined as the smallest integer h ? 1 such that all strings of this length occur at most in a unique position of the text S up to k mismatches every r symbols. We prove that R(S, k, r) is a non-increasing function of r and a non-decreasing function of k and that the equation r = R(S, k, r) admits a unique solution. The repetition index plays an important role in the construction of an indexing data structure based on a trie that rep…

FactorialCombinatorics on wordsString (computer science)Function (mathematics)formal languagesmatching indexingCombinatoricsCombinatorics on wordsIntegerapproximate stringPosition (vector)TrieAlgorithmWord (group theory)Mathematics
researchProduct