Search results for "interactive methods"

showing 10 items of 34 documents

Interactive Multiobjective Robust Optimization with NIMBUS

2018

In this paper, we introduce the MuRO-NIMBUS method for solving multiobjective optimization problems with uncertain parameters. The concept of set-based minmax robust Pareto optimality is utilized to tackle the uncertainty in the problems. We separate the solution process into two stages: the pre-decision making stage and the decision making stage. We consider the decision maker’s preferences in the nominal case, i.e., with the most typical or undisturbed values of the uncertain parameters. At the same time, the decision maker is informed about the objective function values in the worst case to support her/him to make an informed decision. To help the decision maker to understand the behavio…

Mathematical optimization021103 operations researchComputer sciencepareto-tehokkuuspäätöksenteko0211 other engineering and technologiesPareto principlemultiple criteria decision makingRobust optimization02 engineering and technologyrobustnessinteractive methodsDecision makerMinimaxTwo stagesrobust Pareto optimalitymonitavoiteoptimointiepävarmuusMultiobjective optimization problemRobustness (computer science)0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering020201 artificial intelligence & image processing
researchProduct

IRA-EMO : Interactive Method Using Reservation and Aspiration Levels for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

2019

We propose a new interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization method, IRA-EMO. At each iteration, the decision maker (DM) expresses her/his preferences as an interesting interval for objective function values. The DM also specifies the number of representative Pareto optimal solutions in these intervals referred to as regions of interest one wants to study. Finally, a real-life engineering three-objective optimization problem is used to demonstrate how IRA-EMO works in practice for finding the most preferred solution. peerReviewed

Mathematical optimization021103 operations researchOptimization problemComputer sciencemieltymykset0211 other engineering and technologiesReservation02 engineering and technologyInterval (mathematics)interactive methodsMulti-objective optimizationmonitavoiteoptimointievolutionary multi-objective optimization0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering020201 artificial intelligence & image processingregion of interestreference point
researchProduct

Interactive multiobjective optimization with NIMBUS for decision making under uncertainty

2013

We propose an interactive method for decision making under uncertainty, where uncertainty is related to the lack of understanding about consequences of actions. Such situations are typical, for example, in design problems, where a decision maker has to make a decision about a design at a certain moment of time even though the actual consequences of this decision can be possibly seen only many years later. To overcome the difficulty of predicting future events when no probabilities of events are available, our method utilizes groupings of objectives or scenarios to capture different types of future events. Each scenario is modeled as a multiobjective optimization problem to represent differe…

Mathematical optimizationComputer sciencepareto optimalityManagement Science and Operations Researchinteractive methodsDecision makerskenaariotMulti-objective optimizationMoment (mathematics)Conflicting objectivesmultiple objective programmingBusiness Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)uncertainty handlingPortfolio optimizationDecision-makingclassification of objectivesOptimal decisionDecision analysis
researchProduct

NAUTILUS Navigator : free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off

2019

We propose a novel combination of an interactive multiobjective navigation method and a trade-off free way of asking and presenting preference information. The NAUTILUS Navigator is a method that enables the decision maker (DM) to navigate in real time from an inferior solution to the most preferred solution by gaining in all objectives simultaneously as (s)he approaches the Pareto optimal front. This means that, while the DM reaches her/his most preferred solution, (s)he avoids anchoring around the starting solution and, at the same time, sees how the ranges of the reachable objective function values shrink without trading-off. The progress of the motion towards the Pareto optimal front is…

Mathematical optimizationControl and Optimization0211 other engineering and technologiesAnchoringpäätöksentukijärjestelmät02 engineering and technologyManagement Science and Operations ResearchMulti-objective optimizationMotion (physics)Set (abstract data type)käyttöliittymätPreference (economics)MathematicsGraphical user interface021103 operations researchbusiness.industryApplied Mathematicsgraphical user interfaceFunction (mathematics)interactive methodsDecision makermonitavoiteoptimointiComputer Science Applicationsnavigointiinteraktiivisuusmulticriteria decision makingbusinesstrade-off free
researchProduct

A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off

2015

Because the purpose of multiobjective optimization methods is to optimize conflicting objectives simultaneously, they mainly focus on Pareto optimal solutions, where improvement with respect to some objective is only possible by allowing some other objective(s) to impair. Bringing this idea into practice requires the decision maker to think in terms of trading-off, which may limit the ability of effective problem solving. We outline some drawbacks of this and exploit another idea emphasizing the possibility of simultaneous improvement of all objectives. Based on this idea, we propose a technique for handling decision maker’s preferences, which eliminates the necessity to think in terms of t…

Mathematical optimizationControl and OptimizationExploitComputer scienceApplied Mathematicsmedia_common.quotation_subjectpreference informationPreference handlinginteractive methodsManagement Science and Operations ResearchDecision makerMulti-objective optimizationnegotiation supportComputer Science ApplicationsPareto optimalNegotiationmultiple objectivesNAUTILUS methodLimit (mathematics)Focus (optics)media_commonJournal of Global Optimization
researchProduct

An Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Method: Interactive WASF-GA

2015

In this paper, we describe an interactive evolutionary algorithm called Interactive WASF-GA to solve multiobjective optimization problems. This algorithm is based on a preference-based evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm called WASF-GA. In Interactive WASF-GA, a decision maker (DM) provides preference information at each iteration simple as a reference point consisting of desirable objective function values and the number of solutions to be compared. Using this information, the desired number of solutions are generated to represent the region of interest of the Pareto optimal front associated to the reference point given. Interactive WASF-GA implies a much lower computational…

Mathematical optimizationOptimization problemMultiobjective programmingComputer scienceEvolutionary algorithmReference point approachInteractive evolutionary computationPareto optimal solutionsEvolutionary algorithmsPreference (economics)AlgorithmMulti-objective optimizationInteractive methods
researchProduct

Decision making in multiobjective optimization problems under uncertainty: balancing between robustness and quality

2018

As an emerging research field, multiobjective robust optimization employs minmax robustness as the most commonly used concept. Light robustness is a concept in which a parameter, tolerable degradations, can be used to control the loss in the objective function values in the most typical scenario for gaining in robustness. In this paper, we develop a lightly robust interactive multiobjective optimization method, LiRoMo, to support a decision maker to find a most preferred lightly robust efficient solution with a good balance between robustness and the objective function values in the most typical scenario. In LiRoMo, we formulate a lightly robust subproblem utilizing an achievement scalarizi…

Mathematical optimizationdecision supportOptimization problemmultiobjective robust optimizationComputer sciencepäätöksenteko0211 other engineering and technologies02 engineering and technologyManagement Science and Operations ResearchMulti-objective optimizationoptimointiRobustness (computer science)0502 economics and business050210 logistics & transportation021103 operations research05 social scienceslight robust efficiencyRobust optimizationinteractive methodshandling uncertaintyDecision makerMinimaxmonitavoiteoptimointiepävarmuusVisualizationMultiobjective optimization problemtrade-off between robustness and qualityBusiness Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)OR Spectrum
researchProduct

NAUTILUS framework : towards trade-off-free interaction in multiobjective optimization

2016

In this paper, we present a framework of different interactive NAUTILUS methods for multiobjective optimization. In interactive methods, the decision maker iteratively sees solution alternatives and provides one’s preferences in order to find the most preferred solution. We question the widely used setting that the solutions shown to the decision maker should all be Pareto optimal which implies that improvement in any objective function necessitates allowing impairment in some others. Instead, in NAUTILUS we enable the decision maker to make a free search without having to trade-off by starting from an inferior solution and iteratively approaching the Pareto optimal set by allowing all obje…

Pareto optimalityEconomics and EconometricsEngineeringMathematical optimization021103 operations researchbiologybusiness.industry0211 other engineering and technologies02 engineering and technologyinteractive methodsDecision makerbiology.organism_classificationMulti-objective optimizationSet (abstract data type)Pareto optimalOrder (exchange)0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringmulticriteria optimization020201 artificial intelligence & image processingPreference elicitationBusiness and International ManagementNautilusbusiness
researchProduct

Interactive Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization Methods

2016

An overview of interactive methods for solving nonlinear multiobjective optimization problems is given. In interactive methods, the decision maker progressively provides preference information so that the most satisfactory Pareto optimal solution can be found for her or his. The basic features of several methods are introduced and some theoretical results are provided. In addition, references to modifications and applications as well as to other methods are indicated. As the role of the decision maker is very important in interactive methods, methods presented are classified according to the type of preference information that the decision maker is assumed to provide. peerReviewed

Pareto optimalityMathematical optimization021103 operations researchComputer sciencemultiple criteria decision making0211 other engineering and technologies02 engineering and technologyinteractive methodsDecision makernonlinear optimizationMulti-objective optimizationPreferenceNonlinear programmingPareto optimalNonlinear systemMultiobjective optimization problemmultiple objectives0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering020201 artificial intelligence & image processing
researchProduct

Flexible Data Driven Inventory Management with Interactive Multiobjective Lot Size Optimization

2021

We study data-driven decision support and formalise a path from data to decision making. We focus on lot sizing in inventory management with stochastic demand and propose an interactive multi-objective optimisation approach. We forecast demand with a Bayesian model, which is based on sales data. After identifying relevant objectives relying on the demand model, we formulate an optimisation problem to determine lot sizes for multiple future time periods. Our approach combines different interactive multi-objective optimisation methods for finding the best balance among the objectives. For that, a decision maker with substance knowledge directs the solution process with one’s preference inform…

Pareto optimalitydecision supportInformation Systems and ManagementComputer scienceinventory managementdata driven optimisationpäätöksentekomyyntilot sizingpäätöksentukijärjestelmätManagement Science and Operations ResearchManagement Information SystemsData-drivenInventory managementmulticriteria optimisationtoimitusketjutoptimointiBayesian modelsvarastotpareto-tehokkuusbayesilainen menetelmäinteractive methodsIndustrial engineeringdemand forecastingmonimuuttujamenetelmätkysyntäanalyysivarastonvalvontaennustettavuusmallit (mallintaminen)International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management
researchProduct