Search results for "jel:C78"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Evolution of impatience: The example of the Farmer-Sheriff game

2015

The literature on the evolution of impatience, focusing on one-person decision problems, often finds that evolutionary forces favor the more patient individuals. This paper shows that in games where equilibrium involves threat of punishment there are forces generating an evolutionary advantage to the impatient. In particular, it offers a two-population example where evolutionary forces favor impatience in one group while favoring patience in the other. Moreover, efficiency may also favor impatient individuals. In our example, it is efficient for one population to evolve impatience and for the other to develop patience. Yet, evolutionary forces move the opposite direction. Fil: Levine, David…

education.field_of_studyPunishmentEvolutionmedia_common.quotation_subjectPopulationjel:C73Impatiencejel:C78PatienceDecision problemEconomía y NegociosMicroeconomicsCIENCIAS SOCIALESEconomics Econometrics and Finance (all)2001 Economics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)Otras Economía y NegociosEconomicsEvolutionary Game TheoryeducationReplicator DynamicsGeneral Economics Econometrics and FinanceMathematical economicsmedia_common
researchProduct

Commitment and choice of partner in a negotiation with a deadline

2002

This paper analyses the effects of partially revocable endogenous commitments of a seller in a negotiation with a deadline. In particular, we examine when commitment is a source of strength, a source of inefficiency and when it does not affect the bargaining outcome at all. We show that when commitment possesses a minimum amount of irrevocability this crucially determines the bargaining outcome. In the bilateral bargaining case, commitment becomes a source of inefficiency since it causes a deadline effect. In the choice of partner framework, however, the deadline effect disappears and there is an immediate agreement and, moreover, commitment becomes a source of strength since it increases t…

media_common.quotation_subjectStochastic gamejel:C78jel:D43Affect (psychology)Outcome (game theory)jel:J52MicroeconomicsCompetition (economics)NegotiationEconomicsComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDSOCIETYInefficiencyBargaining revocable commitment thin market deadline effectmedia_common
researchProduct