Search results for "justification"

«Det finnes en sang for alt!» Ansattes begrunnelser for sang i barnehage og skole – en empirisk studie.

2022

This chapter is based on two studies which aim to provide knowledge about the position of singing in Norwegian kindergartens and schools: (a) a national quantitative cross-sectional survey with kindergarten teachers and primary school/lower secondary school teachers, and (b) case studies in selected kindergartens and schools, where the data collection consisted of participatory observation and interviews with leaders and teachers. The chapter presents an attempt to incorporate both studies into a triangulation design where different types of data material and different analysis methods (quantitative and qualitative) are combined to investigate the question “why sing?” – that is, how singing…

Le cause di giustificazione della responsabilità civile e la nuova legittima difesa

2020

the essay addresses the problem of wrongfulness in torts and analyzes the recent reform of self-defense. In particular, the study highlights the effects on the structure of tort liability of the expansion of the area of necessary and proportional behavior. The essay aims to offer a systematic picture of the justifications in tort liability

Carlos I. Massini Correas Riduzionismo, fatti sociali e normatività del diritto

2013

Riflessioni sul ragionamento giudiziale (a partire dalla teoria di Manuel Atienza)

2016

In questo lavoro prendo spunto da alcune tesi proposte da Manuel Atienza nell’ambito della sua articolata teoria del ragionamento giuridico e dell’argomentazione giuridica, per un verso per discuterle, e per altro verso per mostrare che alcune di esse possono essere utilmente sviluppate anche al di fuori dello specifico contesto giusteorico da cui provengono (la “teoria del diritto come argomentazione”). In particolare, dopo aver discusso alcune delle specifiche definizioni e distinzioni proposte da Atienza in tema di ragionamento giudiziale, mi soffermerò sulla critica che Atienza rivolge alla tradizionale distinzione tra contesto di giustificazione e contesto di scoperta delle decisioni g…

Proporzionalità, diritti, democrazia

2014

Il principio di proporzionalità è ormai uno dei concetti centrali del costituzionalismo globale, di fatto una parte essenziale della grammatica di una nuova lingua franca che fa dialogare e interagire attori giuridici sostanzialmente in tutto il mondo, agevolando la circolazione di modelli giuridici e di standard di argomentazione. In questo saggio intendo discutere due questioni attinenti al profilo della legittimità dell’utilizzazione del test di proporzionalità in sede giudiziaria. La prima questione riguarda la compatibilità tra l’utilizzo sempre più diffuso del test di proporzionalità e l’intensità della tutela che ci aspettiamo debbano ricevere i diritti fondamentali. La seconda quest…

Epistemic and didactic values of the demonstrative process in different cultures: a case study in Geometry with Chinese and Italian students

2011

Les mutations de la satisfaction équitable à l'aune de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme

2020

Equitable satisfaction was governed by Article 50 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) until the drafting of Protocol 11, which led to Article 41 governing the regime of fair compensation. Section 41 then reads: « If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party. »The principle of indemnisation derives from international law cases which constraints the State failing to fulfil its international commitments to remove retroactively the consequences of the…

Déclaration et vérification des créances. Le chef de file d'un pool bancaire, déclarant des créances tant en son nom personnel qu'au nom de chacun de…

2011

International audience; (Cass., ass. plén., 4 févr. 2011, n° 09-14.619, arrêt n° 588 P+B+R+I, SARL Martine bois et dérivés c/ Sté Unimat et a., D. 2011. 439, obs. A. Lienhard ; Rev. sociétés 2011. 387, obs. P. Roussel Galle)

Honest mistake or perhaps not: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms on the magnitude of dishonesty

2021

Trivial acts of dishonesty are very prevalent in everyday life and have severe economic and societal consequences. The present study aims to examine the role of descriptive and injunctive norms in minor and major dishonesty under ambiguity. We devised a novel experimental design in which rule violations can be the result of honest mistakes or various dishonest processes. In this ambiguous context, we observed a high prevalence of minor rule violations at baseline. In two experiments, exposure to increased peer cheating (i.e., negative descriptive norms) promoted major rule violations, whereas the presence of explicit or subtle rule reminders (i.e., injunctive norms) marginally reduced minor…

Speculation and Justification in Policy-Making on Neuroenhancement

2013

Neuroscientific findings allow interventions in the human brain to improve its function or modify mental states even without medical indication. This procedure, termed as neuroenhancement, is subject to a broad ethical debate. As neuroenhancement is an evolving phenomenon, the debate is necessarily future-oriented and highly dependent on information about future developments. It remains an open question to what degree uncertain forecasting or even speculation should be considered in the ethical debate and policy-making. I propose to distinguish between arguments with three different purposes: intuition-forming, self-reflecting and justifying arguments. Adequate standards are required for al…