Search results for "languages"

showing 10 items of 2101 documents

On prefix normal words and prefix normal forms

2016

A $1$-prefix normal word is a binary word with the property that no factor has more $1$s than the prefix of the same length; a $0$-prefix normal word is defined analogously. These words arise in the context of indexed binary jumbled pattern matching, where the aim is to decide whether a word has a factor with a given number of $1$s and $0$s (a given Parikh vector). Each binary word has an associated set of Parikh vectors of the factors of the word. Using prefix normal words, we provide a characterization of the equivalence class of binary words having the same set of Parikh vectors of their factors. We prove that the language of prefix normal words is not context-free and is strictly contai…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesPrefix codePrefix normal wordPre-necklaceDiscrete Mathematics (cs.DM)General Computer ScienceFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)Binary numberComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryContext (language use)Binary languageLyndon words0102 computer and information sciences02 engineering and technologyPrefix grammarprefix normal formsKraft's inequalityCharacterization (mathematics)Lyndon word01 natural sciencesPrefix normal formenumerationTheoretical Computer ScienceFOS: Mathematics0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringMathematics - CombinatoricsMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsprefix normal words prefix normal forms binary languages binary jumbled pattern matching pre-necklaces Lyndon words enumerationbinary jumbled pattern matchingSettore INF/01 - InformaticaComputer Science (all)pre-necklacesComputer Science::Computation and Language (Computational Linguistics and Natural Language and Speech Processing)prefix normal wordsPrefix010201 computation theory & mathematics020201 artificial intelligence & image processingCombinatorics (math.CO)binary languagesComputer Science::Formal Languages and Automata TheoryWord (group theory)Computer Science - Discrete MathematicsTheoretical Computer Science
researchProduct

Primitive sets of words

2020

Given a (finite or infinite) subset $X$ of the free monoid $A^*$ over a finite alphabet $A$, the rank of $X$ is the minimal cardinality of a set $F$ such that $X \subseteq F^*$. We say that a submonoid $M$ generated by $k$ elements of $A^*$ is {\em $k$-maximal} if there does not exist another submonoid generated by at most $k$ words containing $M$. We call a set $X \subseteq A^*$ {\em primitive} if it is the basis of a $|X|$-maximal submonoid. This definition encompasses the notion of primitive word -- in fact, $\{w\}$ is a primitive set if and only if $w$ is a primitive word. By definition, for any set $X$, there exists a primitive set $Y$ such that $X \subseteq Y^*$. We therefore call $Y$…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesPrimitive setDiscrete Mathematics (cs.DM)General Computer ScienceFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)Pseudo-repetitionComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory0102 computer and information sciences02 engineering and technology01 natural sciencesTheoretical Computer ScienceCombinatoricsCardinalityFree monoidBi-rootFOS: Mathematics0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringMathematics - CombinatoricsRank (graph theory)Primitive root modulo nMathematicsHidden repetitionSettore INF/01 - InformaticaIntersection (set theory)k-maximal monoidFunction (mathematics)Basis (universal algebra)010201 computation theory & mathematics020201 artificial intelligence & image processingCombinatorics (math.CO)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata TheoryWord (group theory)Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
researchProduct

Quantum Pushdown Automata

2001

Quantum finite automata, as well as quantum pushdown automata (QPA) were first introduced by C. Moore and J. P. Crutchfield. In this paper we introduce the notion of QPA in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by using the definition of quantum finite automata of Kondacs and Watrous. It is established that the unitarity criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the corresponding unitarity criteria of quantum Turing machines. We show that QPA can recognize every regular language. Finally we present some simple languages recognized by QPA, not recognizable by deterministic pushdown automata.

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsComputer Science - Computational ComplexityFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational Complexity (cs.CC)Quantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Implications of quantum automata for contextuality

2014

We construct zero-error quantum finite automata (QFAs) for promise problems which cannot be solved by bounded-error probabilistic finite automata (PFAs). Here is a summary of our results: - There is a promise problem solvable by an exact two-way QFA in exponential expected time, but not by any bounded-error sublogarithmic space probabilistic Turing machine (PTM). - There is a promise problem solvable by an exact two-way QFA in quadratic expected time, but not by any bounded-error $ o(\log \log n) $-space PTMs in polynomial expected time. The same problem can be solvable by a one-way Las Vegas (or exact two-way) QFA with quantum head in linear (expected) time. - There is a promise problem so…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsComputer Science - Computational ComplexityFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational Complexity (cs.CC)Quantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Quantum finite multitape automata

1999

Quantum finite automata were introduced by C.Moore, J.P. Crutchfield, and by A.Kondacs and J.Watrous. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata. Moreover, it was proved that not all regular languages can be recognized by quantum finite automata. A.Ambainis and R.Freivalds proved that for some languages quantum finite automata may be exponentially more concise rather than both deterministic and probabilistic finite automata. In this paper we introduce the notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite automaton but not by a deterministic or probabilistic finite automata. This is the first result on …

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsComputer Science - Computational ComplexityTheoryofComputation_MATHEMATICALLOGICANDFORMALLANGUAGESTheoryofComputation_COMPUTATIONBYABSTRACTDEVICESFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational Complexity (cs.CC)Quantum Physics (quant-ph)Nonlinear Sciences::Cellular Automata and Lattice GasesComputer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Span-program-based quantum algorithm for the rank problem

2011

Recently, span programs have been shown to be equivalent to quantum query algorithms. It is an open problem whether this equivalence can be utilized in order to come up with new quantum algorithms. We address this problem by providing span programs for some linear algebra problems. We develop a notion of a high level span program, that abstracts from loading input vectors into a span program. Then we give a high level span program for the rank problem. The last section of the paper deals with reducing a high level span program to an ordinary span program that can be solved using known quantum query algorithms.

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsComputer Science - Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputer Science::Programming LanguagesFOS: Physical sciencesData Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)Quantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Databases
researchProduct

The minimal probabilistic and quantum finite automata recognizing uncountably many languages with fixed cutpoints

2019

Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science ; vol. 22 no. 1 ; Automata, Logic and Semantics ; 1365-8050

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational Complexity (cs.CC)Nonlinear Sciences::Cellular Automata and Lattice GasesComputer Science - Computational ComplexityMathematics::LogicTheoryofComputation_MATHEMATICALLOGICANDFORMALLANGUAGESComputer Science::Discrete MathematicsComputer Science::Logic in Computer ScienceComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDSOCIETYMathematics::Metric GeometryQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Quantum Finite Automata and Probabilistic Reversible Automata: R-trivial Idempotent Languages

2011

We study the recognition of R-trivial idempotent (R1) languages by various models of "decide-and-halt" quantum finite automata (QFA) and probabilistic reversible automata (DH-PRA). We introduce bistochastic QFA (MM-BQFA), a model which generalizes both Nayak's enhanced QFA and DH-PRA. We apply tools from algebraic automata theory and systems of linear inequalities to give a complete characterization of R1 languages recognized by all these models. We also find that "forbidden constructions" known so far do not include all of the languages that cannot be recognized by measure-many QFA.

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputer Science::Computational ComplexityQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Cost-efficient QFA Algorithm for Quantum Computers

2021

The study of quantum finite automata (QFAs) is one of the possible approaches in exploring quantum computers with finite memory. Despite being one of the most restricted models, Moore-Crutchfield quantum finite automaton (MCQFA) is proven to be exponentially more succinct than classical finite automata models in recognizing certain languages such as $\mathtt{MOD}_p = \{ a^{j} \mid j \equiv 0 \mod p\}$, where $p$ is a prime number. In this paper, we present a modified MCQFA algorithm for the language $\mathtt{MOD}_p$, the operators of which are selected based on the basis gates on the available real quantum computers. As a consequence, we obtain shorter quantum programs using fewer basis gat…

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct

Automata and Quantum Computing

2015

Quantum computing is a new model of computation, based on quantum physics. Quantum computers can be exponentially faster than conventional computers for problems such as factoring. Besides full-scale quantum computers, more restricted models such as quantum versions of finite automata have been studied. In this paper, we survey various models of quantum finite automata and their properties. We also provide some open questions and new directions for researchers. Keywords: quantum finite automata, probabilistic finite automata, nondeterminism, bounded error, unbounded error, state complexity, decidability and undecidability, computational complexity

FOS: Computer and information sciencesQuantum PhysicsTheoryofComputation_COMPUTATIONBYABSTRACTDEVICESFormal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)FOS: Physical sciencesTheoryofComputation_GENERALComputer Science - Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational Complexity (cs.CC)68Q10 68Q12 68Q15 68Q19 68Q45Computer Science - Computational ComplexityTheoryofComputation_MATHEMATICALLOGICANDFORMALLANGUAGESComputerSystemsOrganization_MISCELLANEOUSQuantum Physics (quant-ph)Computer Science::Formal Languages and Automata Theory
researchProduct