Search results for "law and moral"

showing 8 items of 18 documents

Principles, balancing, and the separation between law and morals: on neo-constitutionalism and its critics

2011

En el ensayo Constitucionalismo principialista y constitucionalismo garantista, Luigi Ferrajoli ofrece una oportuna clarificación teórica y conceptual sobre el así llamado neoconstitucionalismo. Por mi parte, en esta contribución intentaré desarrollar algunas observaciones sobre tres puntos acerca de los cuales me encuentro en relativo desacuerdo con el análisis de Ferrajoli: el tratamiento de la distinción entre reglas y principios, la interpretación de la práctica de la ponderación, y el problema de la separación entre Derecho y moral. Además, ofreceré un panorama de los significados del (neo)constitucionalismo, y, respecto a tal panorama, consideraré el modo en el cual Ferrajoli sitúa su…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoSeparation between law and moralitymedia_common.quotation_subjectNeo-constitutionalismLegal principlesPrincipiosNeoconstitucionalismoMeaning (philosophy of language)Jurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of lawRelation (history of concept)Balancingmedia_commonFilosofía del DerechoPhilosophyInterpretation (philosophy)K201-487Positivismo jurídicoK1-7720MoralityFerrajoli legal positivism neo-constitutionalism legal principles balancing separation between law and moralityPhilosophyPonderaciónLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceSeparación entre Derecho y moralLegal positivismLawHumanitiesFerrajoli Luigi
researchProduct

Rules, Conventionalism and Normativity: Some Remarks Starting from Hart

2014

The paper deals with the “conventionalist turn” in legal positivism in relation to the matter of the duty to obey the law and legal normativity. In this respect, conventionalist legal positivism is worth considering (a) because it offers an explanation of legal normativity partly different vis-a-vis previous ones and (b) because it tries to preserve the autonomy of legal obligation from moral obligation and coercion, respectively. Here I will only focus on legal conventionalism as sketched out by Hart in the Postscript. Indeed, Hart’s conventionalism comes up against problems which to some extent also affect other distinguished versions of legal conventionalism like, for example, those work…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoconventionalismConventionalismPhilosophymedia_common.quotation_subjectlegal positivism.CoercionEpistemologyLegal positivismlaw and moralMoral obligationLegal normativityObligationRelation (history of concept)DutyAutonomymedia_common
researchProduct

Introduzione. Le cliniche legali: una prospettiva filosofico-giuridica

2019

Does a clinical legal approach tell us something interesting about the nature and the concept of law? This is the main question that this focus will try to answer in affirmative terms. This is a question of legal epistemology that seems not to be so interesting for clinical jurists. Indeed, clinical jurists above all emphasize the importance of legal clinics from the viewpoint of education and social justice, but neglect the contribution that a clinical legal method can offer with respect to the knowledge of law. The papers included in this focus face, from a legal philosophical perspective, each in its own way, the phenomenon of legal clinic approach, which it is spreading in Italy since a…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittolaw and morallaw and forcelegal clinicmigrationhuman rights
researchProduct

Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals

2014

The essay discusses the import of the separability thesis both for legal positivism and for contemporary legal practice. First, the place of the separability thesis in legal positivism will be explored, distinguishing between “standard positivism” and “post-Hartian positivism.” Then I will consider various kinds of relations between law and morality that are worthy of jurisprudential interest, and explore, from a positivist point of view, what kind of relations between law and morality must be rejected, what kind of such relations should be taken into account, and what kind of such relations are indeed of no import at all. The upshot of this analysis consists in highlighting the distinction…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittolaw and moralitylegal positivismlegal positivism legal validity law and moralitylegal validity
researchProduct

Volpi e ricci, ovvero: che cosa rimane del positivismo giuridico?

2017

Sino alla prima metà del xx secolo tutti i principali giuspositivisti condividevano l’idea che il positivismo giuridico presupponesse necessariamente una meta-etica soggettivista e non-cognitivista. Il legame tra una meta-etica soggettivista e non-cognitivista e il positivismo giuridico ad un certo punto è stato reciso. Importanti giuspositivisti cominciano a mettere in discussione che il positivismo giuridico implichi una determinata prospettiva meta-etica. In questo saggio avanzo tre obiezioni al positivismo giuridico da cui che il positivismo giuridico può almeno in parte difendersi solo a condizione di rimanere fedele al soggettivismo e al non-cognitivismo Until the middle of the last c…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittopunto di vista internoargomento della correttezzalegal positivismpositivismo giuridico; diritto e morale; non-cognitivismo; svolta interpretativa; punto di vista interno; argomento della correttezzalaw and moralnon-cognitivisminternal point of viewnon-cognitivismosvolta interpretativainterpretative turnpositivismo giuridicodiritto e moralelegal positivism; law and morals; non-cognitivism; interpretative turn; internal point of view; argument from correctnessargument from correctness
researchProduct

Recensione di Barbari Luca, De Vanna Francesco (a cura di), Il “diritto al viaggio”. Abbecedario delle migrazioni, Giappichelli, Torino, 2018, pp. XI…

2019

Il libro che qui si commenta propone una tesi condivisa – esiste un diritto a migrare quando le condizioni di vita del proprio paese siano, per qualsiasi ragione, intollerabili – e presenta uno stile omogeneo – articoli brevi, tesi espresse attraverso un linguaggio piano e scevro da tecnicismi superflui, taglio interdisciplinare – e per alcuni presupposti di fondo che sono puntualmente esplicitati nella prefazione di Luca Barbari.

diritti umaniSettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittoasylum righthuman rightlaw and morals.migration studiediritto di asilostudi sulle migrazionidiritto e morale.
researchProduct

Ciò che è vivo del positivismo giuridico

2021

In his latest book Massimo La Torre makes a number of criticisms to legal positivism. Most of them are convincing. In this essay I try to reply to the few I disagree with. In particular, I deal with La Torre’s objections against Hart’s theories on legal interpretation and the internal point of view and against Raz’s theory of legitimate authority. In the last paragraph I outline some ideological reasons for not considering legal positivism entirely dead.

legitimate authoritySettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoLegal positivismlegal interpretationlaw and moralityinternal point of viewlaw and force.
researchProduct

Vulnerabilità, concetto di diritto e approccio clinico-legale

2019

Does a clinical legal approach tell us something interesting about the nature and the concept of law? Is it possible to re-think the relationship between law and morals starting from the legal clinics experience? Is the juxtaposition between doctors and jurists convincing? These are the main questions that will be addressed here. They are questions concerning legal epistemology and legal philosophy in the strict sense that seems not to be so interesting for clinical jurists. Indeed, clinical jurists above all emphasize the importance of legal clinics from the viewpoint of education and social justice, but neglect the contribution that a clinical legal method can offer with respect to the kn…

powerSettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittolaw and morallaw and forceclaim to correctnelegal clinichuman rights
researchProduct