Reply to Chousterman et al.: Delaying Renal Replacement Therapy Could Be Harmful in Patients with Acute Brain Injury

Renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury - Authors' reply.

Comparison of two delayed strategies for renal replacement therapy initiation for severe acute kidney injury (AKIKI 2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

International audience; BACKGROUND: Delaying renal replacement therapy (RRT) for some time in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and no severe complication is safe and allows optimisation of the use of medical devices. Major uncertainty remains concerning the duration for which RRT can be postponed without risk. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that a more-delayed initiation strategy would result in more RRT-free days, compared with a delayed strategy. METHODS: This was an unmasked, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled trial done in 39 intensive care units in France. We monitored critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (defined …

MOESM1 of The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury 2 (AKIKI2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Additional file 1. Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Checklist: recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents*.

Delayed versus early initiation of renal replacement therapy for severe acute kidney injury: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Summary Background The timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for severe acute kidney injury is highly debated when no life-threatening complications are present. We assessed whether a strategy of delayed versus early RRT initiation affects 28-day survival in critically ill adults with severe acute kidney injury. Methods In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised trials published from April 1, 2008, to Dec 20, 2019, that compared delayed and early RRT initiation strategies in patients with severe acute kidney injury. Trials were eligible for inclusion …

Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects many ICU patients and is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Although lifesaving in many situations, renal replacement therapy (RRT) may be associated with complications, and the appropriate timing of its initiation is still the subject of intense debate. An early initiation strategy can prevent some metabolic complications, whereas a delayed one may allow for renal function recovery in some patients without need for this costly and potentially dangerous technique. For years, most of the knowledge on this issue stemmed from observational studies or small randomized controlled trials. Recent randomized controlled trials have indicated that a w…

The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury 2 (AKIKI2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury (AKIKI) trial showed that a delayed renal replacement therapy (RRT) strategy for severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients was safe and associated with major reduction in RRT initiation compared with an early strategy. The five criteria which mandated RRT initiation in the delayed arm were: severe hyperkalemia, severe acidosis, acute pulmonary edema due to fluid overload resulting in severe hypoxemia, serum urea concentration > 40 mmol/l and oliguria/anuria > 72 h. However, duration of anuria/oliguria and level of blood urea are still criteria open to debate. The objective of the study is to compar…

Proceedings of Réanimation 2017, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress

The AKIKI 2 trial: a case for strategy of initiation instead of timing - Authors' reply.

Perception des poussées de polyarthrite rhumatoïde telles que rapportées par les patients : sous-analyse de l’essai STRASS sur les stratégies de diminution progressive du traitement

Resume Objectifs Dans la polyarthrite rhumatoide (PR), patients et medecins peuvent avoir des perceptions differentes. L’objectif de ce travail etait de definir la notion de « poussees » du point de vue du patient. Methodes Analyse post-hoc d’un essai comparatif randomise consacre a une strategie de diminution progressive des anti-TNF chez des patients atteints de PR, ayant un score DAS 28 de remission depuis au moins six mois et randomises dans deux groupes : « espacement » (E) ou « maintien » (M) du traitement. La survenue de poussees rapportees par le patient (PRP) a ete evaluee tous les trois mois sur une periode de 18 mois par la question suivante : « Au cours des trois derniers mois, …