6533b7cefe1ef96bd1257a5e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

L?atribució hipotètica de Curial e Güelfa a Enyego d?Àvalos (Consideracions sobre un «informe» de L. Badia i J. Torró)

Abel Soler

subject

HistoryUNESCO::CIENCIAS DE LAS ARTES Y LAS LETRASLiterature and Literary Theorymedia_common.quotation_subjectlcsh:Literature (General)lcsh:D111-203lcsh:Medieval historyContext (language use)Artlcsh:PN1-6790Medieval literatureLanguage and LinguisticsKingdomlcsh:D204-475:CIENCIAS DE LAS ARTES Y LAS LETRAS [UNESCO]medicinemedicine.symptomHumanitieslcsh:Modern history 1453-Confusionmedia_common

description

Resum: La revista Estudis Romanics 39 (2017) ha publicat el meu article: “Enyego d’Avalos, autor del Curial e Guelfa ?”, que resumeix una part de la meua tesi doctoral, La cort napolitana d’Alfons el Magnanim: el context del «Curial e Guelfa» (Universitat de Valencia, 2016). L’article defensa la hipotesi que Enyego d’Avalos –natural de Toledo, educat a Valencia, conseller de Felip Maria Visconti i gran camarlenc d’Alfons el Magnanim, al regne de Napols– hauria estat l’autor de la novel·la cavalleresca anonima Curial e Guelfa . Encara que la tesi es inedita, Lola Badia i Jaume Torro s’han manifestat en contra de la hipotesi mitjancant declaracions difamatories en mitjans de comunicacio i un Informe molt tendencios. El meu proposit en aquest article es rebatre els arguments suposadament cientifics de Lola Badia i Jaume Torro, posar en evidencia els seus prejudicis i tergiversacions, i reivindicar el meu dret a aportar els resultats de la meua recerca i a expressar lliurement les meues interpretacions. La meua tesi, fruit d’anys de treball arxivistic i bibliografic, ha estat elaborada d’acord amb una rigorosa metodologia cientifica. La insolita reaccio de Badia i Torro obeeix al fet que la meua hipotesi questiona una gran part dels plantejaments d’ambdos investigadors, els quals han provocat una gran desorientacio, ja que situen el Curial en les corts iberiques del Trastamara i no en les corts del duc de Mila i del rei de Napols, en contacte amb l’humanisme italia. Paraules clau: Curial e Guelfa, Enyego d’Avalos, Valencia, Mila, Napols, Alfons el Magnanim, Lola Badia, Jaume Torro Abstract: The journal Estudis Romanics , 39 (2017) has just published my article “Enyego de Avalos, author of the Curial e Guelfa?”, which summarizes a part of my thesis, La cort napolitana d’Alfons el Magnanim: el context del «Curial e Guelfa» (University of Valencia, 2016). It supports the hypothesis that Enyego d’Avalos –a native of Toledo, educated in Valencia, Philip Maria Visconti’s counselor and great Chamberlain of Alfons the Magnanimous, at the Kingdom of Naples– would have been the author of the chivalric anonymous romance Curial e Guelfa . Although unpublished thesis, Lola Badia and Jaume Torro have spoken out against my hypothesis through defamatory statements to the media and a very biased report. My purpose in this article is to refute the supposedly scientific arguments of Lola Badia and Jaume Torro, highlight their prejudices and misunderstandings and claim my right to make my own research and to freely express my interpretations. My thesis, which is the result of years of work in archives and analysis of a selected bibliography, has been prepared in accordance with rigorous scientific methodology. The unusual reaction of Badia and Torro is due to the fact that my hypothesis invalidates many of their approaches, which have caused great confusion among historins of medieval literature, because they place Curial in the Iberian courts of the Trastamara royal family and not in the courts of the duke of Milan and of the King of Naples, in touch with Italian humanism. Keywords: Curial e Guelfa, Enyego d’Avalos, Valencia, Milan, Naples, Alfons the Magnanimous, Lola Badia, Jaume Torro

10.7203/scripta.9.10342http://hdl.handle.net/10550/63592