6533b7cffe1ef96bd12584f8
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Group cohesion in group-based personal practice
Daniela HahnFlorian WeckFranziska KühneUlrike Maaßsubject
Longitudinal studyPsychodynamic psychotherapyCognitive Behavioral Therapymedicine.medical_treatmentProfessional developmentExploratory researchContext (language use)General MedicinePsychotherapyCohesion (linguistics)Group psychotherapyClinical PsychologyGroup cohesivenessPsychotherapy GroupmedicineHumansLongitudinal StudiesPsychologySocial CohesionClinical psychologydescription
AbstractBackgroundPersonal practice (PP) is an integral component of many psychotherapy training programmes. It aims to promote personal and professional growth and is often conducted in a group format (g-PP). Group cohesion is one of the most researched mechanisms in group psychotherapy, but has rarely been studied in the context of g-PP.Aims and methodThis exploratory study examines the associations between cohesion, satisfaction with g-PP, its impact on personal and professional development, and theoretical orientation in a sample of n = 329 German psychotherapy trainees. Cohesion was assessed with the group questionnaire (GQ-D; Positive Bonding, Positive Working, Negative Relationship).ResultsOverall, participants reported high levels of all outcome variables. Positive Bonding was the strongest predictor of satisfaction with g-PP (β = 0.46, p<.001). While trainees in cognitive behaviour therapy reported significantly better cohesion scores (d≥0.31), trainees in psychodynamic therapy reported significantly higher satisfaction with g-PP and its impact on their developments (d≥0.30).ConclusionsGroup cohesion appears to be an important factor in g-PP that should be actively promoted by group leaders. However, longitudinal study designs are needed to better understand the emergence of cohesion in g-PP as well as potential moderating factors.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-09-28 | Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy |