6533b7cffe1ef96bd1258eb0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

GENETIC POLYMORPHISM OF THE FOURTH COMPONENT OF HUMAN COMPLEMENT: POPULATION STUDY AND PROPOSAL FOR A REVISED NOMENCLATURE BASED ON GENOMIC PCR TYPING OF RODGERS AND CHIDO DETERMINANTS

Ch. RittnerBeate Stradmann-bellinghausenPeter M. Schneider

subject

GeneticsPolymorphism GeneticPopulationImmunologyHaplotypeComplement C4General MedicineBiologyPolymerase Chain ReactionAllotypeTransplantationEpitopesPolymorphism (computer science)GeneticsHumansTypingRestriction fragment length polymorphismAlleleMolecular BiologyGenotypingGenetics (clinical)

description

SUMMARY The fourth component of human complement (C4) is coded for by two homologous genes, C4A and C4B, located in the class III region of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Genetic typing of C4A and B alleles is routinely carried out by high-voltage agarose gel electrophoresis. The electrophoretic C4 polymorphism can be further subdivided by the Rodgers (Rg) and Chido (Ch) blood groups, which are antigenic determinants of the C4A and B alpha-chains, respectively. We have used a recently described direct PCR typing method using sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) in combination with electrophoretic C4 typing as well as genomic RFLP analysis to determine the frequency of C4 allotypes, Rg/Ch subtypes and C4A-B haplotypes in a family study of the German population. As the current C4 allele designation does not provide any information about the presence or absence of Rodgers and Chido antigens, we have developed an extension to the existing C4 nomenclature. This revised allele designation combines the exisiting numerical allotypes defined by electrophoretic mobility with eight subtypes (01–08) based on Rg/Ch PCR genotyping results. Using this approach, most electrophoretic allotypes could be subdivided. Among the C4A allotypes, the most common allele was A*0301 (59.9%), and the most common subtype among all electrophoretic allotypes was 01 (85.1%; = Rg1,2-positive, Ch-negative). For C4B, the most common allele was B*0101 (64.3%), and the most common subtype was 01 (79.6%; = Ch1,2,3,4,5,6-positive, Rg-negative). The subtypes 03, 04, 07 and 08 of the C4A allotypes, and the subtypes 03, 07 and 08 of the C4B allotypes, were not detected in this study. The analysis of duplicated C4 alleles revealed considerable heterogeneity of their subtypes. The results demonstrate that all known C4 allotypes can now be assigned unambiguously, which facilitates the identification of MHC haplotypes relevant for transplantation and disease association studies.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-313x.1996.tb00006.x