6533b7cffe1ef96bd12598a9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparative evaluation of molecular methods for the quantitative measure of torquetenovirus (TTV) viremia, the new surrogate marker of immune competence

Chiara MediciPaola MazzettiMarzia Del ReRomano DanesiMauro PistelloPietro Giorgio SpeziaGuido AntonelliDavid NavarroLisa MaceraFabrizio MaggiEleonora RofiDaniele Focosi

subject

Concordancedigital droplet PCR; methods comparison; real-time PCR; torquetenovirusViremiaTTVBiologyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionComparative evaluation03 medical and health sciencesTTV; digital droplet PCR; methods comparison; real-time PCR0302 clinical medicineImmune systemVirologymedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineViremiaDigital droplet pcrTorque teno virusSurrogate endpointReproducibility of Resultsmedicine.diseaseVirologyDNA Virus InfectionsQuantitative measuretorquetenovirusInfectious DiseasesReal-time polymerase chain reactionCase-Control StudiesDNA Viral030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyreal-time PCRImmunocompetencedigital droplet PCRBiomarkersmethods comparison

description

Background Torquetenovirus (TTV) viremia is emerging as a promising tool to assess functional immune competence, to predict posttransplant immune-related complications, and eventually to customize immunosuppression. Methods In this study, 327 blood samples were tested using two real-time PCR (rtPCR) assays both targeted to the untranslated region of the TTV genome. The first assay was an in-house rtPCR developed by our group, the second one was the recently marketed TTV R-GENE assay. Results In the validation study, the TTV R-GENE showed good performances in precision and reproducibility, and sensitivity as low as 12 TTV DNA copies/mL, like previously reported for the in-house rtPCR. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between the two methods was -0.3 log copies/mL. In the comparison study, 69% and 72% of samples were detected positive by rtPCR and TTV R-GENE, respectively (94% concordance, κ = 0.88). Performances did not differ between the two rtPCRs by type of TTV group examined. When a newly-developed in-house digital droplet PCR was applied for TTV quantification and used as an alternative method of comparison on 94 samples, the results strongly correlated with those obtained by the two rtPCR methods (99% concordance). Conclusion In summary, all the molecular methods assayed are highly sensitive and accurate in quantitation of TTV DNA in blood samples.

10.1002/jmv.25488http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2102339