6533b7cffe1ef96bd1259aa0
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Risk Factors of Coronary Artery Disease in Secondary Prevention—Results from the AtheroGene—Study
Elvin ZenginChristoph BickelRenate B SchnabelTanja ZellerKarl-j LacknerHans-j RupprechtStefan BlankenbergDirk WestermannChristoph Sinning For The Atherogene–study Investigatorssubject
Malemedicine.medical_specialtylcsh:MedicineRenal functionCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary artery diseaseAnginaCohort StudiesRisk FactorsInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusmedicineSecondary PreventionHumansMyocardial infarctionRisk factorlcsh:ScienceProportional Hazards ModelsMultidisciplinarybusiness.industrylcsh:RHazard ratioMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseCardiologyRegression Analysislcsh:QFemalebusinessCohort studyResearch ArticleFollow-Up Studiesdescription
Background Risk factors are important in cardiovascular (CV) medicine for risk stratification of patients. We aimed to compare the traditional risk factors to clinical variables for the prediction of secondary cardiovascular events. Methods and Results For this study, 3229 patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. We calculated whether the traditional risk factors, diabetes mellitus, increased LDL/HDL ratio, arterial hypertension and smoking alone and in combination with the clinical variables, ejection fraction, creatinine clearance, multi-vessel disease and CRP concentration predict the outcome cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (N = 432) during the mean follow-up time of 4.2 ± 2.0 years. In this cohort diabetes mellitus was the risk factor with the strongest influence regarding occurrence of secondary events (hazard ratio; HR:1.70, confidence interval; CI 95%: 1.36-2.11; P0.0001) or calculated creatinine clearence (Cockroft-Gault formula) (HR:2.26 CI 95%:1.78-2.89; P<0.0001). Further ameliorating risk stratification from the clinical variables were CRP and multi-vessel disease. The most precise risk prediction was achieved when all clinical variables were added to the CV risk factors. Conclusion Diabetes mellitus has the strongest influence to predict secondary cardiovascular events in patients with known CAD. Risk stratification can further be improved by adding CV risk factors and clinical variables together. Control of risk factors is of paramount importance in patients with known CAD, while clinical variables can further enhance prediction of events.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-07-01 | PLoS ONE |