6533b7d0fe1ef96bd125ae1b
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Patients' and therapists' experiences of general change mechanisms during bug-in-the-eye and delayed video-based supervised cognitive-behavioral therapy. A randomized controlled trial.
Florian WeckJulia M B Müller-nengThomas ProbstMartin BohusMartin BohusYvonne M. KaufmannYvonne M. KaufmannMarion Jakobsubject
AdultMale050103 clinical psychologymedicine.medical_specialtyInservice TrainingTherapeutic Alliancemedicine.medical_treatmentFeedback PsychologicalHealth PersonnelPsychological interventionVideo RecordingInterpersonal communicationlaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Randomized controlled triallawDigital Video BroadcastingMedicinePsychologyHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesSession (computer science)Cognitive Behavioral Therapybusiness.industryMental Disorders05 social sciencesMultilevel modelMiddle Aged030227 psychiatryCognitive behavioral therapyClinical PsychologyOutcome and Process Assessment Health CareOrganization and AdministrationPhysical therapyFemalebusinessIntrapersonal communicationdescription
Objective This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigated whether bug-in-the-eye (BITE) supervision (live computer-based supervision during a psychotherapy session) affects the manner in which patients and therapists experience general change mechanisms (GCMs) during cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Method A total of 23 therapists were randomized either to the BITE condition or the control condition (delayed video-based [DVB] supervision). After each session, both patients (BITE: n = 19; DVB: n = 23) and therapists (BITE: n = 11; DVB: n = 12) completed the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Bernese Post Session Report (BPSR). The HAQ total score and the 3 secondary factors of the BPSR (interpersonal experiences, intrapersonal experiences, problem actuation) functioned as GCMs. Multilevel models were performed. Results For patients, GCMs did not develop differently between BITE and DVB during CBT. Therapists rated the alliance as well as interpersonal and intrapersonal experiences not significantly different between BITE and DVB during CBT, but they perceived problem actuation to increase significantly more in BITE than in DVB (p < .05). Conclusion BITE supervision might be helpful in encouraging CBT therapists to apply interventions, which focus on the activation of relevant problems and related emotions.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-10-28 | Journal of clinical psychology |