6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125c396

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Will legal international rhino horn trade save wild rhino populations?

Yingying X. G. WangWolf M. MooijBradley SchroderJasper A. J. EikelboomHerbert H. T. PrinsRascha J.m. NuijtenFrank Van LangeveldeIgnas M. A. Heitkönig

subject

0106 biological sciencesAquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementPopulationWildlifeRhinocerosConservation010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesArticleSouth AfricaTraditional Chinese medicinesocioeconomicsWildlife crimelcsh:QH540-549.5uhanalaiset eläimetDevelopment economicsRevenueTraditional Chinese Medicinesalametsästyseducationkiinalainen lääketiedesosioekonomiset tekijätEcology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationLegalizationeducation.field_of_studylajiensuojeluPlan_S-Compliant-TAEcologyCITES010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyLaw enforcementconservationsarvikuonotPoachingAquatische Ecologie en WaterkwaliteitsbeheerPE&RCVillieläimistön ja -kasviston uhanalaisten lajien kansainvälistä kauppaa koskeva yleissopimuswildlife crimekansainväliset sopimuksetCITESSocioeconomicsInternationalWildlife Ecology and ConservationWIASEtelä-AfrikkaBusinesslcsh:Ecology

description

Wild vertebrate populations all over the globe are in decline, with poaching being the second-most-important cause. The high poaching rate of rhinoceros may drive these species into extinction within the coming decades. Some stakeholders argue to lift the ban on international rhino horn trade to potentially benefit rhino conservation, as current interventions appear to be insufficient. We reviewed scientific and grey literature to scrutinize the validity of reasoning behind the potential benefit of legal horn trade for wild rhino populations. We identified four mechanisms through which legal trade would impact wild rhino populations, of which only the increased revenue for rhino farmers could potentially benefit rhino conservation. Conversely, the global demand for rhino horn is likely to increase to a level that cannot be met solely by legal supply. Moreover, corruption is omnipresent in countries along the trade routes, which has the potential to negatively affect rhino conservation. Finally, programmes aimed at reducing rhino horn demand will be counteracted through trade legalization by removing the stigma on consuming rhino horn. Combining these insights and comparing them with criteria for sustainable wildlife farming, we conclude that legalizing rhino horn trade will likely negatively impact the remaining wild rhino populations. To preserve rhino species, we suggest to prioritize reducing corruption within rhino horn trade, increasing the rhino population within well-protected 'safe havens' and implementing educational programmes and law enforcement targeted at rhino horn consumers. peerReviewed

10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01145http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7273149