6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125c41e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A German multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer.
C. KaufmannJuergen R. FischerMartin SebastianD. BinderAlexander SchmittelP. HortigUlrich KeilholzL. Fischer Von WeikersthalB. FischerKarel CacaWilfried EberhardtPeter MartusHartmut LinkThomas Gaulersubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyLung NeoplasmsMedizinIrinotecanGastroenterologyDisease-Free SurvivalCarboplatinchemistry.chemical_compoundInternal medicineGermanyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical endpointMedicineHumansLung cancerEtoposideAgedEtoposideAged 80 and overbusiness.industryHazard ratioArea under the curveHematologyMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaCarboplatinConfidence intervalSurgeryIrinotecanOncologychemistryCamptothecinFemalebusinessmedicine.drugdescription
Background This trial was designed to prove superiority of irinotecan over etoposide combined with carboplatin in extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg x min/ml either in combination with irinotecan 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 (IP) or etoposide 140 mg/m2 on days 1-3 (EP). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. Results Of 226 patients, 216 were eligible. Median PFS was 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-7.0] in the IP arm and 6.0 months (95% CI 5.2-6.8) in EP arm (P = 0.07). Median survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 8.4-11.6) and 9.0 months (95% CI 7.6-10.4) in the IP and EP arm (P = 0.06), respectively. Hazard ratios for disease progression and OS were 1.29 (95% CI 0.96-1.73, P = 0.095) and 1.34 (95% CI 0.97-1.85, P = 0.072), respectively. No difference in response rates was observed. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity favored the IP arm, whereas diarrhea was significantly more frequent in the IP arm. Conclusion This trial failed to show superiority of irinotecan over etoposide in combination with carboplatin.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011-08-01 | Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology |