6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125cd27
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Carotenoid-based colour of acanthocephalan cystacanths plays no role in host manipulation.
Guillaume MartinaudRaphaël DodetNicolas KaldonskiMarie-jeanne Perrot-minnotFrank Cézillysubject
[ SDV.MP.PAR ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Microbiology and Parasitology/ParasitologyFood ChaincolourTroutColorGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biologyhost manipulationPredationAcanthocephalaHost-Parasite InteractionsPomphorhynchus laevisGammarus pulex[ SDV.EE.IEO ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology environment/SymbiosisAnimalsAmphipodaGeneral Environmental ScienceNegative phototaxisGeneral Immunology and MicrobiologybiologyEcologyIntermediate hostGeneral Medicinebiology.organism_classificationCarotenoidsTroutGammarus pulexPulexPredatory BehaviorFreshwater fishPolymorphus minutusPomphorhynchus laevispredationGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesResearch Articledescription
Manipulation by parasites is a catchy concept that has been applied to a large range of phenotypic alterations brought about by parasites in their hosts. It has, for instance, been suggested that the carotenoid-based colour of acanthocephalan cystacanths is adaptive through increasing the conspicuousness of infected intermediate hosts and, hence, their vulnerability to appropriate final hosts such as fish predators. We revisited the evidence in favour of adaptive coloration of acanthocephalan parasites in relation to increased trophic transmission using the crustacean amphipodGammarus pulexand two species of acanthocephalans,Pomphorhynchus laevisandPolymorphus minutus. Both species show carotenoid-based colorations, but rely, respectively, on freshwater fish and aquatic bird species as final hosts. In addition, the two parasites differ in the type of behavioural alteration brought to their common intermediate host.Pomphorhynchus laevisreverses negative phototaxis inG. pulex, whereasP. minutusreverses positive geotaxis. In aquaria, trout showed selective predation forP. laevis-infected gammarids, whereasP. minutus-infected ones did not differ from uninfected controls in their vulnerability to predation. We tested for an effect of parasite coloration on increased trophic transmission by painting a yellow–orange spot on the cuticle of uninfected gammarids and by masking the yellow–orange spot of infected individuals with inconspicuous brown paint. To enhance realism, match of colour between painted mimics and true parasite was carefully checked using a spectrometer. We found no evidence for a role of parasite coloration in the increased vulnerability of gammarids to predation by trout. Painted mimics did not differ from control uninfected gammarids in their vulnerability to predation by trout. In addition, covering the place through which the parasite was visible did not reduce the vulnerability of infected gammarids to predation by trout. We discuss alternative evolutionary explanations for the origin and maintenance of carotenoid-based colorations in acanthocephalan parasites.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009-01-07 |